| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Add functions to simply print some basic state information in selftests.
The output can be enabled by setting:
#define TH_LOG_ENABLED 1
#define DEBUG 1
* print_psw: current SIE state description and VM run state
* print_hex_bytes: print memory with some counting markers
* print_hex: PRINT_HEX with 512 bytes
* print_run: use print_psw and print_hex to print contents of VM run
state and SIE state description
* print_regs: print content of general and control registers
All prints use pr_debug for the output and can be configured using
DEBUG.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
|
|
Subsequent tests do require direct manipulation of the SIE control
block. This commit introduces the SIE control block definition for use
within the selftests.
There are already definitions of this within the kernel.
This differs in two ways.
* This is the first definition of this in userspace.
* In the context of the selftests this does not require atomicity for
the flags.
With the userspace definition of the SIE block layout now being present
we can reuse the values in other tests where applicable.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
|
|
Multiple test cases need page size and shift definitions.
By moving the definitions to a single architecture specific header we
limit the repetition.
Make use of PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHIFT and PAGE_MASK defines in existing
code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
|
|
Effectively revert the movement of code from kvm_util.h => kvm_util_base.h,
as the TL;DR of the justification for the move was to avoid #idefs and/or
circular dependencies between what ended up being ucall_common.h and what
was (and now again, is), kvm_util.h.
But avoiding #ifdef and circular includes is trivial: don't do that. The
cost of removing kvm_util_base.h is a few extra includes of ucall_common.h,
but that cost is practically nothing. On the other hand, having a "base"
version of a header that is really just the header itself is confusing,
and makes it weird/hard to choose names for headers that actually are
"base" headers, e.g. to hold core KVM selftests typedefs.
For all intents and purposes, this reverts commit
7d9a662ed9f0403e7b94940dceb81552b8edb931.
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add support for tagging and untagging guest physical address, e.g. to
allow x86's SEV and TDX guests to embed shared vs. private information in
the GPA. SEV (encryption, a.k.a. C-bit) and TDX (shared, a.k.a. S-bit)
steal bits from the guest's physical address space that is consumed by the
CPU metadata, i.e. effectively aliases the "real" GPA.
Implement generic "tagging" so that the shared vs. private metadata can be
managed by x86 without bleeding too many details into common code.
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Cc: Vishal Annapurve <[email protected]>
Cc: Ackerly Tng <[email protected]>
cc: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Roth <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Carlos Bilbao <[email protected]>
Originally-by: Michael Roth <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Define the expected architecture specific exit reason for a successful
ucall so that common tests can assert that a ucall occurred without the
test needing to implement arch specific code.
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add an architecture specific ucall.h and inline the simple arch hooks,
e.g. the init hook for everything except ARM, and the actual "do ucall"
hook for everything except x86 (which should be simple, but temporarily
isn't due to carrying a workaround).
Having a per-arch ucall header will allow adding a #define for the
expected KVM exit reason for a ucall that is colocated (for everything
except x86) with the ucall itself.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add cpu_relax() for s390 and x86 for use in arch-agnostic tests. arm64
already defines its own version.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
|
|
The DIAGNOSE 0x0318 instruction, unique to s390x, is a privileged call
that must be intercepted via SIE, handled in userspace, and the
information set by the instruction is communicated back to KVM.
To test the instruction interception, an ad-hoc handler is defined which
simply has a VM execute the instruction and then userspace will extract
the necessary info. The handler is defined such that the instruction
invocation occurs only once. It is up to the caller to determine how the
info returned by this handler should be used.
The diag318 info is communicated from userspace to KVM via a sync_regs
call. This is tested during a sync_regs test, where the diag318 info is
requested via the handler, then the info is stored in the appropriate
register in KVM via a sync registers call.
If KVM does not support diag318, then the tests will print a message
stating that diag318 was skipped, and the asserts will simply test
against a value of 0.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
|
|
Code that takes care of basic CPU setup, page table walking, etc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
|