| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Currently, the sud_test expects the emulated syscall to return the
emulated syscall number. This assumption only works on architectures
were the syscall calling convention use the same register for syscall
number/syscall return value. This is not the case for RISC-V and thus
the return value must be also emulated using the provided ucontext.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
|
|
Michael Kerrisk suggested that, from an API perspective, it is a bad
idea to share the PR_SYS_DISPATCH_ defines between the prctl operation
and the selector variable.
Therefore, define two new constants to be used by SUD's selector variable
and update the corresponding documentation and test cases.
While this changes the API syscall user dispatch has never been part of a
Linux release, it will show up for the first time in 5.11.
Suggested-by: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Implement functionality tests for syscall user dispatch. In order to
make the test portable, refrain from open coding syscall dispatchers and
calculating glibc memory ranges.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|