| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Move to using tools/include/ instead.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
This would fix the build error caused by:
383776fa7 ("locking/lockdep: Handle statically initialized
PER_CPU locks properly")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
This provides PTR_ERR() now used by lockdep.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
- More rcu stubs
- New dummy headers due to sched header split
- jhash2 included in due to kernel lockdep inclusion and usage
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Mixing fd-based and stream-base IO results in interleaved output like
following:
=====================================
liblockdep 4.7.6
-------------------------------------
conopal/372 is trying to release lock (0x3a45c) at:
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN11PTimedMutex6SignalEv+0x3c) [0xb613c688]
but there are no more locks to release!
other info that might help us debug this:
no locks held by conopal/372.
stack backtrace:
=====================================
liblockdep 4.7.6
---------------------------------/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x1e3c)[0xb67c2e3c]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x5fe0)[0xb67c6fe0]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x6450)[0xb67c7450]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(lock_release+0x5c)[0xb67c7c40]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(pthread_mutex_unlock+0x38)[0xb67c91d4]
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN11PTimedMutex6SignalEv+0x3c)[0xb613c688]
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN10PContainer14AssignContentsERKS_+0xe4)[0xb6160730]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormat14AssignContentsERK10PContainer+0x90)[0xb6435edc]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormataSERK7PString+0x68)[0xb643b610]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormatC2EPKc+0x68)[0xb643b6cc]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN11OpalWAVFile14AddMediaFormatERK15OpalMediaFormat+0x330)[0xb66b2224]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(+0x2526f8)[0xb640c6f8]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x102f0)[0xb6f852f0]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x1044c)[0xb6f8544c]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0xac4)[0xb6f75ac4]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x1e3c)[0xb67c2e3c]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x5fe0)[0xb67c6fe0]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(+0x6450)[0xb67c7450]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(lock_release+0x5c)[0xb67c7c40]
/usr/lib/liblockdep.so.4.7.6(pthread_mutex_unlock+0x38)[0xb67c91d4]
/lib/libpt.so.2.17-alpha2(_ZN11PTimedMutex6SignalEv+0x3c)[0xb613c688]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormat14AssignContentsERK10PContainer+0x78)[0xb6435ec4]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormataSERK7PString+0x68)[0xb643b610]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN15OpalMediaFormatC2EPKc+0x68)[0xb643b6cc]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(_ZN11OpalWAVFile14AddMediaFormatERK15OpalMediaFormat+0x330)[0xb66b2224]
/lib/libopal.so.3.17-alpha2(+0x2526f8)[0xb640c6f8]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x102f0)[0xb6f852f0]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0x1044c)[0xb6f8544c]
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3(+0xac4)[0xb6f75ac4]
Therefore change all bare printf(...) to dprintf(STDOUT_FILENO, ...) to
sychronize with backtrace_symbols_fd().
[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
We define init_utsname() as static but not inline, resulting
in a warning for every source file that includes lockdep.h but
doesn't call it.
Since it is only used by lockdep.c, define it in there.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
liblockdep defines trivial macros for working with interrupt flags, as
interrupts are never disabled in userland. This results in warnings
from gcc when -Wunused-but-set-variable is enabled, and it is enabled
by -Wall. Fix this by evaluating the flags parameter and casting it to
void.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
liblockdep defines various macros that may expand to an expression
with no effect, while the in-kernel definition does have an effect.
This results in warnings from gcc when -Wunused-value is enabled, and
is is enabled by -Wall. Fix this by introducing trivial functions,
as function return values are generally allowed to be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
lockdep.c now uses ARRAY_SIZE().
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 75dd602a5198 ("lockdep: Fix lock_chain::base size")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
liblockdep has been broken since commit 75dd602a5198 ("lockdep: Fix
lock_chain::base size"), as that adds a check that MAX_LOCK_DEPTH is
within the range of lock_chain::depth and in liblockdep it is much
too large.
That should have resulted in a compiler error, but didn't because:
- the check uses ARRAY_SIZE(), which isn't yet defined in liblockdep
so is assumed to be an (undeclared) function
- putting a function call inside a BUILD_BUG_ON() expression quietly
turns it into some nonsense involving a variable-length array
It did produce a compiler warning, but I didn't notice because
liblockdep already produces too many warnings if -Wall is enabled
(which I'll fix shortly).
Even before that commit, which reduced lock_chain::depth from 8 bits
to 6, MAX_LOCK_DEPTH was too large.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # for versions before 4.6, use a value of 255
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
This was added to the kernel code in <1658d35ead5d> ("list: Use
READ_ONCE() when testing for empty lists").
There's nothing special we need to do about it in userspace.
Signed-off-by: Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455864533-7536-2-git-send-email-alfredoalvarezernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
It seems that newer gcc complains about lack of explicit declaration for some
of the API we use, add it in.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
These were added to the kernel code in cee34d88c ("lockdep: Fix a race between
/proc/lock_stat and module unload"). There's nothing special we need to do
about them in userspace.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
Recent changes to rbtree.h may break compilation. There is no
reason to use a liblockdep specific header to begin with, so
we'll use the one shared with all other tools/.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
As Peter Zijlstra pointed out, the varargs for WARN() are
optional, so we need to correctly handle the case where they
don't exist.
This would cause a compilation error.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Recent changes to kernel/locking/lockdep.c broke the liblockdep build. Fix
that.
Signed-off-by: Eunbong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
Combine all definitions into a common tools/include/linux/types.h and
kill the wild growth elsewhere. Move DECLARE_BITMAP to its proper
bitmap.h header.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
|
|
So tools/ has been growing three, at a different stage of their
development export.h headers and so we should unite into one. Add
tools/include/ to the include path of virtio and liblockdep to pick the
shared header now.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
|
|
Commit 63f9a7fde7 "asmlinkage: Make lockdep_sys_exit asmlinkage" has added
asmlinkage annotation to lockdep_sys_exit, which broke build of liblockdep.
Since we don't need asmlinkage in liblockep, just ignore it.
Reported-by: Eunbong Song <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Robin Hack <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
Stub out rcu_is_watching(), prevents build error with the updated
tree.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
kernel/locking/lockdep.c deals with validating locking scenarios for
various architectures supported by the kernel. There isn't
anything kernel specific going on in lockdep, and when we
compare userspace to other architectures that don't have to deal
with irqs such as s390, they become all too similar.
We wrap kernel/locking/lockdep.c and include/linux/lockdep.h with
several headers which allow us to build and use lockdep from
userspace. We don't touch the kernel code itself which means
that any work done on lockdep in the kernel will automatically
benefit userspace lockdep as well!
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|