aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-08-12tools/nolibc: compiler: use attribute((naked)) if availableThomas Weißschuh1-2/+7
The current entrypoint attributes optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer") are intended to avoid all compiler generated code, like function porologue and epilogue. This is the exact usecase implemented by the attribute "naked". Unfortunately this is not implemented by GCC for all targets, so only use it where available. This also provides compatibility with clang, which recognizes the "naked" attribute but not the previously used attribute "optimized". Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-6-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
2024-08-12tools/nolibc: move entrypoint specifics to compiler.hThomas Weißschuh1-0/+3
The specific attributes for the _start entrypoint are duplicated for each architecture. Deduplicate it into a dedicated #define into compiler.h. For clang compatibility, the epilogue will also need to be adapted, so move that one, too. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-5-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
2024-08-10tools/nolibc: compiler: introduce __nolibc_has_attribute()Thomas Weißschuh1-7/+9
Recent compilers support __has_attribute() to check if a certain compiler attribute is supported. Unfortunately we have to first check if __has_attribute is supported in the first place and then if a specific attribute is present. These two checks can't be folded into a single condition as that would lead to errors. Nesting the two conditions like below works, but becomes ugly as soon as #else blocks are used as those need to be duplicated for both levels of #if. #if defined __has_attribute # if __has_attribute (nonnull) # define ATTR_NONNULL __attribute__ ((nonnull)) # endif #endif Introduce a new helper which makes the usage of __has_attribute() nicer and migrate the current user to it. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-4-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
2023-06-09tools/nolibc: fix segfaults on compilers without attribute no_stack_protectorThomas Weißschuh1-0/+10
Not all compilers, notably GCC < 10, have support for __attribute__((no_stack_protector)). Fall back to a mechanism that also works there. Tested with GCC 9.5.0 from kernel.org crosstools. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-06-09tools/nolibc: add autodetection for stackprotector supportThomas Weißschuh1-0/+15
The stackprotector support in nolibc should be enabled iff it is also enabled in the compiler. Use the preprocessor defines added by gcc and clang if stackprotector support is enable to automatically do so in nolibc. This completely removes the need for any user-visible API. To avoid inlining the lengthy preprocessor check into every user introduce a new header compiler.h that abstracts the logic away. As the define NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR is now not user-relevant anymore prefix it with an underscore. Suggested-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230520133237.GA27501@1wt.eu/ Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>