| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
It makes sense to move the important monitor structure into rodata to
prevent accidental structure modification.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
|
|
Add missing __init/__exit annotations to module init/exit funcs.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 24bce201d798 ("tools/rv: Add dot2k")
Fixes: 8812d21219b9 ("rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor skeleton created by dot2k")
Fixes: ccc319dcb450 ("rv/monitor: Add the wwnr monitor")
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
|
|
The sparse tool complains as follows:
kernel/trace/rv/monitors/wwnr/wwnr.c:18:19:
warning: symbol 'rv_wwnr' was not declared. Should it be static?
The `rv_wwnr` symbol is not dereferenced by other extern files,
so add static qualifier for it.
So does wip module.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Cc: <[email protected]>
Fixes: ccc319dcb450 ("rv/monitor: Add the wwnr monitor")
Fixes: 8812d21219b9 ("rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor skeleton created by dot2k")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
|
|
Monitor's automata definition is only used locally, so make
them static for all existing monitors.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a50e27c3738d6ef809f4201857229fed64799234.1661266564.git.bristot@kernel.org
Fixes: ccc319dcb450 ("rv/monitor: Add the wwnr monitor")
Fixes: 8812d21219b9 ("rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor skeleton created by dot2k")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
|
|
Per task wakeup while not running (wwnr) monitor.
This model is broken, the reason is that a task can be running in the
processor without being set as RUNNABLE. Think about a task about to
sleep:
1: set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
2: schedule();
And then imagine an IRQ happening in between the lines one and two,
waking the task up. BOOM, the wakeup will happen while the task is
running.
Q: Why do we need this model, so?
A: To test the reactors.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/473c0fc39967250fdebcff8b620311c11dccad30.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Clark Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Tao Zhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
|
|
The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the
wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled:
|
|
v
#==================#
H preemptive H <+
#==================# |
| |
| preempt_disable | preempt_enable
v |
sched_waking +------------------+ |
+--------------- | | |
| | non_preemptive | |
+--------------> | | -+
+------------------+
The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because
of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count
and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some
inconsistencies might happen.
The documentation illustrates one of these cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Clark Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Tao Zhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
|
|
THIS CODE IS NOT LINKED TO THE MAKEFILE.
This model does not compile because it lacks the instrumentation
part, which will be added next. In the typical case, there will be
only one patch, but it was split into two patches for educational
purposes.
This is the direct output this command line:
$ dot2k -d tools/verification/models/wip.dot -t per_cpu
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5eb7a9118917e8a814c5e49853a72fc62be0a101.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Clark Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Tao Zhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
|