aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-08-22wifi: iwlegacy: Avoid multiple -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warningsGustavo A. R. Silva1-145/+158
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are getting ready to enable it, globally. So, in order to avoid ending up with a flexible-array member in the middle of multiple other structs, we use the `__struct_group()` helper to create new tagged structures with the suffix `_hdr`. These structures group together all the members of the original flexible structures except the flexible arrays. As a result, the arrays are effectively separated from the rest of the members without modifying the memory layout of the flexible structures. We then change the type of the middle struct members currently causing trouble from the original flex struct to the newly created structs with suffix `_hdr`. We also want to ensure that when new members need to be added to the flexible structures, they are always included within the newly created tagged structs. For this, we use `static_assert()`. This ensures that the memory layout for both the flexible structure and the new tagged struct is the same after any changes. This approach avoids having to implement the `_hdr` structures as completely separate structures, thus preventing having to maintain two independent but basically identical structures, closing the door to potential bugs in the future. We also use `container_of()` whenever we need to retrieve a pointer to the flexible structure, through which we can access the flexible-array member, if necessary. Also, remove a couple of unused zero-length arrays and flexible-array members. So, with these changes, fix the following warnings: drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:1196:38: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:1197:36: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:2505:30: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:2549:26: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:2654:31: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:2665:30: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:2673:26: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/commands.h:3349:30: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/Zr2gxERA3RL3EwRe@elsanto
2022-09-28iwlegacy: Replace zero-length arrays with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helperGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length arrays declarations in anonymous union with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro. This helper allows for flexible-array members in unions. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/193 Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/223 Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YzIvzc0jsYLigO8a@work
2021-10-18treewide: Replace open-coded flex arrays in unionsKees Cook1-2/+4
In support of enabling -Warray-bounds and -Wzero-length-bounds and correctly handling run-time memcpy() bounds checking, replace all open-coded flexible arrays (i.e. 0-element arrays) in unions with the DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro. This fixes warnings such as: fs/hpfs/anode.c: In function 'hpfs_add_sector_to_btree': fs/hpfs/anode.c:209:27: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'struct bplus_internal_node[0]' [-Wzero-length-bounds] 209 | anode->btree.u.internal[0].down = cpu_to_le32(a); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ In file included from fs/hpfs/hpfs_fn.h:26, from fs/hpfs/anode.c:10: fs/hpfs/hpfs.h:412:32: note: while referencing 'internal' 412 | struct bplus_internal_node internal[0]; /* (internal) 2-word entries giving | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c: In function 'es58x_fd_tx_can_msg': drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:360:35: warning: array subscript 65535 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds] 360 | tx_can_msg = (typeof(tx_can_msg))&es58x_fd_urb_cmd->raw_msg[msg_len]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_core.h:22, from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:17: drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.h:231:6: note: while referencing 'raw_msg' 231 | u8 raw_msg[0]; | ^~~~~~~ Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Ayush Sawal <[email protected]> Cc: Vinay Kumar Yadav <[email protected]> Cc: Rohit Maheshwari <[email protected]> Cc: Herbert Xu <[email protected]> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> Cc: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]> Cc: Luca Coelho <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Cc: KP Singh <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Cc: Mordechay Goodstein <[email protected]> Cc: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> Cc: Arunachalam Santhanam <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Mailhol <[email protected]> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> # drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/* Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
2020-05-12iwlegacy: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-11/+11
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507185529.GA14639@embeddedor
2015-11-18iwlegacy: move under intel directoryKalle Valo1-0/+3370
Part of reorganising wireless drivers directory and Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>