Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Top of the kernel thread stack should be reserved for pt_regs. However
this is not the case for the idle threads of the secondary boot harts.
Their stacks overlap with their pt_regs, so both may get corrupted.
Similar issue has been fixed for the primary hart, see c7cdd96eca28
("riscv: prevent stack corruption by reserving task_pt_regs(p) early").
However that fix was not propagated to the secondary harts. The problem
has been noticed in some CPU hotplug tests with V enabled. The function
smp_callin stored several registers on stack, corrupting top of pt_regs
structure including status field. As a result, kernel attempted to save
or restore inexistent V context.
Fixes: 9a2451f18663 ("RISC-V: Avoid using per cpu array for ordered booting")
Fixes: 2875fe056156 ("RISC-V: Add cpu_ops and modify default booting method")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich@syntacore.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240523084327.2013211-1-geomatsi@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
name is not used anywhere at all. cpu_prepare and cpu_disable do nothing
and always return 0 if implemented.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121234736.3489608-3-samuel.holland@sifive.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Running sparse shows cpu_ops_spinwait.c is missing two definitions
found in head.h, so include it to stop the following warnings:
arch/riscv/kernel/cpu_ops_spinwait.c:15:6: warning: symbol '__cpu_spinwait_stack_pointer' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kernel/cpu_ops_spinwait.c:16:6: warning: symbol '__cpu_spinwait_task_pointer' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220713215306.94675-1-ben.dooks@sifive.com
Fixes: c78f94f35cf6 ("RISC-V: Use __cpu_up_stack/task_pointer only for spinwait method")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
The hartid variable is of type int but compared with
ULONG_MAX(INVALID_HARTID). This issue is fixed by changing
the hartid variable type to unsigned long.
Fixes: c78f94f35cf6 ("RISC-V: Use __cpu_up_stack/task_pointer only for spinwait method")
Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527051743.2829940-3-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
The __cpu_up_stack/task_pointer array is only used for spinwait method
now. The per cpu array based lookup is also fragile for platforms with
discontiguous/sparse hartids. The spinwait method is only used for
M-mode Linux or older firmwares without SBI HSM extension. For general
Linux systems, ordered booting method is preferred anyways to support
cpu hotplug and kexec.
Make sure that __cpu_up_stack/task_pointer is only used for spinwait
method. Take this opportunity to rename it to
__cpu_spinwait_stack/task_pointer to emphasize the purpose as well.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Currently, all non-booting harts start booting after the booting hart
updates the per-hart stack pointer. This is done in a way that, it's
difficult to implement any other booting method without breaking the
backward compatibility.
Define a cpu_ops method that allows to introduce other booting methods
in future. Modify the current booting method to be compatible with
cpu_ops.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
|