diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 38 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c | 27 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c | 62 |
3 files changed, 116 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 4ceec8c2a484..df1cae459c77 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -14336,7 +14336,43 @@ again: } break; case BPF_JNE: - /* we don't derive any new information for inequality yet */ + if (!is_reg_const(reg2, is_jmp32)) + swap(reg1, reg2); + if (!is_reg_const(reg2, is_jmp32)) + break; + + /* try to recompute the bound of reg1 if reg2 is a const and + * is exactly the edge of reg1. + */ + val = reg_const_value(reg2, is_jmp32); + if (is_jmp32) { + /* u32_min_value is not equal to 0xffffffff at this point, + * because otherwise u32_max_value is 0xffffffff as well, + * in such a case both reg1 and reg2 would be constants, + * jump would be predicted and reg_set_min_max() won't + * be called. + * + * Same reasoning works for all {u,s}{min,max}{32,64} cases + * below. + */ + if (reg1->u32_min_value == (u32)val) + reg1->u32_min_value++; + if (reg1->u32_max_value == (u32)val) + reg1->u32_max_value--; + if (reg1->s32_min_value == (s32)val) + reg1->s32_min_value++; + if (reg1->s32_max_value == (s32)val) + reg1->s32_max_value--; + } else { + if (reg1->umin_value == (u64)val) + reg1->umin_value++; + if (reg1->umax_value == (u64)val) + reg1->umax_value--; + if (reg1->smin_value == (s64)val) + reg1->smin_value++; + if (reg1->smax_value == (s64)val) + reg1->smax_value--; + } break; case BPF_JSET: if (!is_reg_const(reg2, is_jmp32)) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c index 0c9abd279e18..820d0bcfc474 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c @@ -590,12 +590,7 @@ static void range_cond(enum num_t t, struct range x, struct range y, *newy = range(t, max_t(t, x.a, y.a), min_t(t, x.b, y.b)); break; case OP_NE: - /* generic case, can't derive more information */ - *newx = range(t, x.a, x.b); - *newy = range(t, y.a, y.b); - break; - - /* below extended logic is not supported by verifier just yet */ + /* below logic is supported by the verifier now */ if (x.a == x.b && x.a == y.a) { /* X is a constant matching left side of Y */ *newx = range(t, x.a, x.b); @@ -2097,10 +2092,22 @@ static struct subtest_case crafted_cases[] = { {U32, S32, {0, U32_MAX}, {U32_MAX, U32_MAX}}, - {S32, U64, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)S32_MIN}, {(u32)(s32)-255, 0}}, - {S32, S64, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)-255}, {(u32)(s32)-2, 0}}, - {S32, S64, {0, 1}, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)S32_MIN}}, - {S32, U32, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)S32_MIN}, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)S32_MIN}}, + {S32, U64, {(u32)S32_MIN, (u32)S32_MIN}, {(u32)(s32)-255, 0}}, + {S32, S64, {(u32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)-255}, {(u32)(s32)-2, 0}}, + {S32, S64, {0, 1}, {(u32)S32_MIN, (u32)S32_MIN}}, + {S32, U32, {(u32)S32_MIN, (u32)S32_MIN}, {(u32)S32_MIN, (u32)S32_MIN}}, + + /* edge overlap testings for BPF_NE */ + {U64, U64, {0, U64_MAX}, {U64_MAX, U64_MAX}}, + {U64, U64, {0, U64_MAX}, {0, 0}}, + {S64, U64, {S64_MIN, 0}, {S64_MIN, S64_MIN}}, + {S64, U64, {S64_MIN, 0}, {0, 0}}, + {S64, U64, {S64_MIN, S64_MAX}, {S64_MAX, S64_MAX}}, + {U32, U32, {0, U32_MAX}, {0, 0}}, + {U32, U32, {0, U32_MAX}, {U32_MAX, U32_MAX}}, + {S32, U32, {(u32)S32_MIN, 0}, {0, 0}}, + {S32, U32, {(u32)S32_MIN, 0}, {(u32)S32_MIN, (u32)S32_MIN}}, + {S32, U32, {(u32)S32_MIN, S32_MAX}, {S32_MAX, S32_MAX}}, }; /* Go over crafted hard-coded cases. This is fast, so we do it as part of diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c index ec430b71730b..960998f16306 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c @@ -1075,4 +1075,66 @@ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ : __clobber_all); } +SEC("tc") +__description("bounds check with JMP_NE for reg edge") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void reg_not_equal_const(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r6 = r1; \ + r1 = 0; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \ + r4 = r0; \ + r4 &= 7; \ + if r4 != 0 goto l0_%=; \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l0_%=: r1 = r6; \ + r2 = 0; \ + r3 = r10; \ + r3 += -8; \ + r5 = 0; \ + /* The 4th argument of bpf_skb_store_bytes is defined as \ + * ARG_CONST_SIZE, so 0 is not allowed. The 'r4 != 0' \ + * is providing us this exclusion of zero from initial \ + * [0, 7] range. \ + */ \ + call %[bpf_skb_store_bytes]; \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32), + __imm(bpf_skb_store_bytes) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("tc") +__description("bounds check with JMP_EQ for reg edge") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void reg_equal_const(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r6 = r1; \ + r1 = 0; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \ + r4 = r0; \ + r4 &= 7; \ + if r4 == 0 goto l0_%=; \ + r1 = r6; \ + r2 = 0; \ + r3 = r10; \ + r3 += -8; \ + r5 = 0; \ + /* Just the same as what we do in reg_not_equal_const() */ \ + call %[bpf_skb_store_bytes]; \ +l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32), + __imm(bpf_skb_store_bytes) + : __clobber_all); +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; |