diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 115 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_scalar_ids.c | 171 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c | 8 |
3 files changed, 59 insertions, 235 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 8dade7b51430..f8c474e8e597 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4124,96 +4124,6 @@ static void mark_all_scalars_imprecise(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_ } } -static bool idset_contains(struct bpf_idset *s, u32 id) -{ - u32 i; - - for (i = 0; i < s->count; ++i) - if (s->ids[i] == (id & ~BPF_ADD_CONST)) - return true; - - return false; -} - -static int idset_push(struct bpf_idset *s, u32 id) -{ - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(s->count >= ARRAY_SIZE(s->ids))) - return -EFAULT; - s->ids[s->count++] = id & ~BPF_ADD_CONST; - return 0; -} - -static void idset_reset(struct bpf_idset *s) -{ - s->count = 0; -} - -/* Collect a set of IDs for all registers currently marked as precise in env->bt. - * Mark all registers with these IDs as precise. - */ -static int mark_precise_scalar_ids(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *st) -{ - struct bpf_idset *precise_ids = &env->idset_scratch; - struct backtrack_state *bt = &env->bt; - struct bpf_func_state *func; - struct bpf_reg_state *reg; - DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, 64); - int i, fr; - - idset_reset(precise_ids); - - for (fr = bt->frame; fr >= 0; fr--) { - func = st->frame[fr]; - - bitmap_from_u64(mask, bt_frame_reg_mask(bt, fr)); - for_each_set_bit(i, mask, 32) { - reg = &func->regs[i]; - if (!reg->id || reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) - continue; - if (idset_push(precise_ids, reg->id)) - return -EFAULT; - } - - bitmap_from_u64(mask, bt_frame_stack_mask(bt, fr)); - for_each_set_bit(i, mask, 64) { - if (i >= func->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE) - break; - if (!is_spilled_scalar_reg(&func->stack[i])) - continue; - reg = &func->stack[i].spilled_ptr; - if (!reg->id) - continue; - if (idset_push(precise_ids, reg->id)) - return -EFAULT; - } - } - - for (fr = 0; fr <= st->curframe; ++fr) { - func = st->frame[fr]; - - for (i = BPF_REG_0; i < BPF_REG_10; ++i) { - reg = &func->regs[i]; - if (!reg->id) - continue; - if (!idset_contains(precise_ids, reg->id)) - continue; - bt_set_frame_reg(bt, fr, i); - } - for (i = 0; i < func->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; ++i) { - if (!is_spilled_scalar_reg(&func->stack[i])) - continue; - reg = &func->stack[i].spilled_ptr; - if (!reg->id) - continue; - if (!idset_contains(precise_ids, reg->id)) - continue; - bt_set_frame_slot(bt, fr, i); - } - } - - return 0; -} - /* * __mark_chain_precision() backtracks BPF program instruction sequence and * chain of verifier states making sure that register *regno* (if regno >= 0) @@ -4346,31 +4256,6 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) bt->frame, last_idx, first_idx, subseq_idx); } - /* If some register with scalar ID is marked as precise, - * make sure that all registers sharing this ID are also precise. - * This is needed to estimate effect of find_equal_scalars(). - * Do this at the last instruction of each state, - * bpf_reg_state::id fields are valid for these instructions. - * - * Allows to track precision in situation like below: - * - * r2 = unknown value - * ... - * --- state #0 --- - * ... - * r1 = r2 // r1 and r2 now share the same ID - * ... - * --- state #1 {r1.id = A, r2.id = A} --- - * ... - * if (r2 > 10) goto exit; // find_equal_scalars() assigns range to r1 - * ... - * --- state #2 {r1.id = A, r2.id = A} --- - * r3 = r10 - * r3 += r1 // need to mark both r1 and r2 - */ - if (mark_precise_scalar_ids(env, st)) - return -EFAULT; - if (last_idx < 0) { /* we are at the entry into subprog, which * is expected for global funcs, but only if diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_scalar_ids.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_scalar_ids.c index 13b29a7faa71..b642d5c24154 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_scalar_ids.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_scalar_ids.c @@ -5,54 +5,27 @@ #include "bpf_misc.h" /* Check that precision marks propagate through scalar IDs. - * Registers r{0,1,2} have the same scalar ID at the moment when r0 is - * marked to be precise, this mark is immediately propagated to r{1,2}. + * Registers r{0,1,2} have the same scalar ID. + * Range information is propagated for scalars sharing same ID. + * Check that precision mark for r0 causes precision marks for r{1,2} + * when range information is propagated for 'if <reg> <op> <const>' insn. */ SEC("socket") __success __log_level(2) -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 4: (bf) r3 = r10") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r2 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns") -__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) -__naked void precision_same_state(void) -{ - asm volatile ( - /* r0 = random number up to 0xff */ - "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" - "r0 &= 0xff;" - /* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */ - "r1 = r0;" - "r2 = r0;" - /* force r0 to be precise, this immediately marks r1 and r2 as - * precise as well because of shared IDs - */ - "r3 = r10;" - "r3 += r0;" - "r0 = 0;" - "exit;" - : - : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) - : __clobber_all); -} - -/* Same as precision_same_state, but mark propagates through state / - * parent state boundary. - */ -SEC("socket") -__success __log_level(2) -__msg("frame0: last_idx 6 first_idx 5 subseq_idx -1") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 5: (bf) r3 = r10") +/* first 'if' branch */ +__msg("6: (0f) r3 += r0") +__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 4: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0") __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r1,r2 stack=:") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 4: (05) goto pc+0") __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r2 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255") -__msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0 stack=:") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns") +/* second 'if' branch */ +__msg("from 4 to 5: ") +__msg("6: (0f) r3 += r0") +__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 5: (bf) r3 = r10") +__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 4: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0") +/* parent state already has r{0,1,2} as precise */ +__msg("frame0: parent state regs= stack=:") __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) -__naked void precision_cross_state(void) +__naked void linked_regs_bpf_k(void) { asm volatile ( /* r0 = random number up to 0xff */ @@ -61,9 +34,8 @@ __naked void precision_cross_state(void) /* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */ "r1 = r0;" "r2 = r0;" - /* force checkpoint */ - "goto +0;" - /* force r0 to be precise, this immediately marks r1 and r2 as + "if r1 > 7 goto +0;" + /* force r0 to be precise, this eventually marks r1 and r2 as * precise as well because of shared IDs */ "r3 = r10;" @@ -75,59 +47,18 @@ __naked void precision_cross_state(void) : __clobber_all); } -/* Same as precision_same_state, but break one of the +/* Same as linked_regs_bpf_k, but break one of the * links, note that r1 is absent from regs=... in __msg below. */ SEC("socket") __success __log_level(2) -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r2 stack= before 5: (bf) r3 = r10") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r2 stack= before 4: (b7) r1 = 0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r2 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns") -__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) -__naked void precision_same_state_broken_link(void) -{ - asm volatile ( - /* r0 = random number up to 0xff */ - "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" - "r0 &= 0xff;" - /* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */ - "r1 = r0;" - "r2 = r0;" - /* break link for r1, this is the only line that differs - * compared to the previous test - */ - "r1 = 0;" - /* force r0 to be precise, this immediately marks r1 and r2 as - * precise as well because of shared IDs - */ - "r3 = r10;" - "r3 += r0;" - "r0 = 0;" - "exit;" - : - : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) - : __clobber_all); -} - -/* Same as precision_same_state_broken_link, but with state / - * parent state boundary. - */ -SEC("socket") -__success __log_level(2) -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r2 stack= before 6: (bf) r3 = r10") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r2 stack= before 5: (b7) r1 = 0") -__msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r2 stack=:") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 4: (05) goto pc+0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r2 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255") +__msg("7: (0f) r3 += r0") +__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 6: (bf) r3 = r10") __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0 stack=:") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns") +__msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 5: (25) if r0 > 0x7 goto pc+0") +__msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r2 stack=:") __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) -__naked void precision_cross_state_broken_link(void) +__naked void linked_regs_broken_link(void) { asm volatile ( /* r0 = random number up to 0xff */ @@ -136,18 +67,13 @@ __naked void precision_cross_state_broken_link(void) /* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */ "r1 = r0;" "r2 = r0;" - /* force checkpoint, although link between r1 and r{0,2} is - * broken by the next statement current precision tracking - * algorithm can't react to it and propagates mark for r1 to - * the parent state. - */ - "goto +0;" /* break link for r1, this is the only line that differs - * compared to precision_cross_state() + * compared to the previous test */ "r1 = 0;" - /* force r0 to be precise, this immediately marks r1 and r2 as - * precise as well because of shared IDs + "if r0 > 7 goto +0;" + /* force r0 to be precise, + * this eventually marks r2 as precise because of shared IDs */ "r3 = r10;" "r3 += r0;" @@ -164,10 +90,16 @@ __naked void precision_cross_state_broken_link(void) */ SEC("socket") __success __log_level(2) -__msg("11: (0f) r2 += r1") +__msg("12: (0f) r2 += r1") /* Current state */ -__msg("frame2: last_idx 11 first_idx 10 subseq_idx -1") -__msg("frame2: regs=r1 stack= before 10: (bf) r2 = r10") +__msg("frame2: last_idx 12 first_idx 11 subseq_idx -1 ") +__msg("frame2: regs=r1 stack= before 11: (bf) r2 = r10") +__msg("frame2: parent state regs=r1 stack=") +__msg("frame1: parent state regs= stack=") +__msg("frame0: parent state regs= stack=") +/* Parent state */ +__msg("frame2: last_idx 10 first_idx 10 subseq_idx 11 ") +__msg("frame2: regs=r1 stack= before 10: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0") __msg("frame2: parent state regs=r1 stack=") /* frame1.r{6,7} are marked because mark_precise_scalar_ids() * looks for all registers with frame2.r1.id in the current state @@ -192,7 +124,7 @@ __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 4: (85) call pc+1") __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r1,r6 stack=") /* Parent state */ __msg("frame0: last_idx 3 first_idx 1 subseq_idx 4") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r6 stack= before 3: (bf) r6 = r0") +__msg("frame0: regs=r1,r6 stack= before 3: (bf) r6 = r0") __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0") __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255") __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) @@ -230,7 +162,8 @@ static __naked __noinline __used void precision_many_frames__bar(void) { asm volatile ( - /* force r1 to be precise, this immediately marks: + "if r1 > 7 goto +0;" + /* force r1 to be precise, this eventually marks: * - bar frame r1 * - foo frame r{1,6,7} * - main frame r{1,6} @@ -247,14 +180,16 @@ void precision_many_frames__bar(void) */ SEC("socket") __success __log_level(2) +__msg("11: (0f) r2 += r1") /* foo frame */ -__msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack=-8,-16 before 9: (bf) r2 = r10") +__msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 10: (bf) r2 = r10") +__msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 9: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0") __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack=-8,-16 before 8: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1") __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack=-8 before 7: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1") __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 4: (85) call pc+2") /* main frame */ -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1 stack=-8 before 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1") -__msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0") +__msg("frame0: regs=r1 stack=-8 before 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1") +__msg("frame0: regs=r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0") __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255") __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) __naked void precision_stack(void) @@ -283,7 +218,8 @@ void precision_stack__foo(void) */ "*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1;" "*(u64*)(r10 - 16) = r1;" - /* force r1 to be precise, this immediately marks: + "if r1 > 7 goto +0;" + /* force r1 to be precise, this eventually marks: * - foo frame r1,fp{-8,-16} * - main frame r1,fp{-8} */ @@ -299,15 +235,17 @@ void precision_stack__foo(void) SEC("socket") __success __log_level(2) /* r{6,7} */ -__msg("11: (0f) r3 += r7") -__msg("frame0: regs=r6,r7 stack= before 10: (bf) r3 = r10") +__msg("12: (0f) r3 += r7") +__msg("frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 11: (bf) r3 = r10") +__msg("frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 9: (25) if r7 > 0x7 goto pc+0") /* ... skip some insns ... */ __msg("frame0: regs=r6,r7 stack= before 3: (bf) r7 = r0") __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r6 stack= before 2: (bf) r6 = r0") /* r{8,9} */ -__msg("12: (0f) r3 += r9") -__msg("frame0: regs=r8,r9 stack= before 11: (0f) r3 += r7") +__msg("13: (0f) r3 += r9") +__msg("frame0: regs=r9 stack= before 12: (0f) r3 += r7") /* ... skip some insns ... */ +__msg("frame0: regs=r9 stack= before 10: (25) if r9 > 0x7 goto pc+0") __msg("frame0: regs=r8,r9 stack= before 7: (bf) r9 = r0") __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r8 stack= before 6: (bf) r8 = r0") __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) @@ -328,8 +266,9 @@ __naked void precision_two_ids(void) "r9 = r0;" /* clear r0 id */ "r0 = 0;" - /* force checkpoint */ - "goto +0;" + /* propagate equal scalars precision */ + "if r7 > 7 goto +0;" + "if r9 > 7 goto +0;" "r3 = r10;" /* force r7 to be precise, this also marks r6 */ "r3 += r7;" diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c index 64d722199e8f..59a020c35647 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 22\ mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r2 stack=:\ mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 20 first_idx 20\ - mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2,r9 stack= before 20\ + mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 20\ mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r2,r9 stack=:\ mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 19 first_idx 17\ mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2,r9 stack= before 19\ @@ -183,10 +183,10 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ, .errstr = "mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 7 first_idx 7\ - mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r4 stack=-8:\ + mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r4 stack=:\ mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 6 first_idx 4\ - mark_precise: frame0: regs=r4 stack=-8 before 6: (b7) r0 = -1\ - mark_precise: frame0: regs=r4 stack=-8 before 5: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)\ + mark_precise: frame0: regs=r4 stack= before 6: (b7) r0 = -1\ + mark_precise: frame0: regs=r4 stack= before 5: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)\ mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r3 -8) = r0\ mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r0 stack=:\ mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 3 first_idx 3\ |