Merge branch 'flower-control-flags'

Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen says:

====================
flower: validate control flags

I have reviewed the flower control flags code.
In all, but one (sfc), the flags field wasn't
checked properly for unsupported flags.

In this series I have only included a single example
user for each helper function. Once the helpers are in,
I will submit patches for all other drivers implementing
flower.

After which there will be:
- 6 drivers using flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags()
- 8 drivers using flow_rule_has_control_flags()
- 11 drivers using flow_rule_match_has_control_flags()

---
Changelog:

v3:
- Added Reviewed-by from Louis Peens (first two patches)
- Properly fixed kernel-doc format

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240410093235.5334-1-ast@fiberby.net/
- Squashed the 3 helper functions to one commmit (requested by Baowen Zheng)
- Renamed helper functions to avoid double negatives (suggested by Louis Peens)
- Reverse booleans in some functions and callsites to align with new names
- Fix autodoc format

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240408130927.78594-1-ast@fiberby.net/
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions