aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_recursion.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>2022-10-25 11:45:19 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-10-25 23:11:46 -0700
commite8b02296a6b8d07de752d6157d863a642117bcd3 (patch)
tree4c91db052a526edd1deba8b1c3509bc117345dec /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_recursion.c
parent6d65500c34d897329ed1be0fd3c4014ec52cd473 (diff)
bpf: Avoid taking spinlock in bpf_task_storage_get if potential deadlock is detected
bpf_task_storage_get() does a lookup and optionally inserts new data if BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE is present. During lookup, it will cache the lookup result and caching requires to acquire a spinlock. When potential deadlock is detected (by the bpf_task_storage_busy pcpu-counter added in commit bc235cdb423a ("bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]")), the current behavior is returning NULL immediately to avoid deadlock. It is too pessimistic. This patch will go ahead to do a lookup (which is a lockless operation) but it will avoid caching it in order to avoid acquiring the spinlock. When lookup fails to find the data and BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE is set, an insertion is needed and this requires acquiring a spinlock. This patch will still return NULL when a potential deadlock is detected. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-5-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_recursion.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions