aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_recursion.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>2022-10-25 11:45:23 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-10-25 23:11:46 -0700
commit0334b4d8822a22b3593aec7361c50e9ebc31ee88 (patch)
treee574b029b28bdb955262991a2803ea0a66aac0fe /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_recursion.c
parent8a7dac37f27a3dfbd814bf29a73d6417db2c81d9 (diff)
selftests/bpf: Ensure no task storage failure for bpf_lsm.s prog due to deadlock detection
This patch adds a test to check for deadlock failure in bpf_task_storage_{get,delete} when called by a sleepable bpf_lsm prog. It also checks if the prog_info.recursion_misses is non zero. The test starts with 32 threads and they are affinitized to one cpu. In my qemu setup, with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, I can reproduce it within one second if it is run without the previous patches of this set. Here is the test error message before adding the no deadlock detection version of the bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}: test_nodeadlock:FAIL:bpf_task_storage_get busy unexpected bpf_task_storage_get busy: actual 2 != expected 0 test_nodeadlock:FAIL:bpf_task_storage_delete busy unexpected bpf_task_storage_delete busy: actual 2 != expected 0 Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-9-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_recursion.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions