aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-11-17 19:11:34 -0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-11-17 19:22:15 -0800
commitdb6bf999544c8c8dcae093e91eba4570647874b1 (patch)
treefc2189d72c73316748a1a856eb6c5d3aa39f8ab8 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests
parent98b2afc8a67f651ed01fc7d5a7e2528e63dd4e08 (diff)
parent0a2f85a1be4328d29aefa54684d10c23a3298fef (diff)
Merge branch 'Allocated objects, BPF linked lists'
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi says: ==================== This series introduces user defined BPF objects of a type in program BTF. This allows BPF programs to allocate their own objects, build their own object hierarchies, and use the basic building blocks provided by BPF runtime to build their own data structures flexibly. Then, we introduce the support for single ownership BPF linked lists, which can be put inside BPF maps, or allocated objects, and hold such allocated objects as elements. It works as an instrusive collection, which is done to allow making allocated objects part of multiple data structures at the same time in the future. The eventual goal of this and future patches is to allow one to do some limited form of kernel style programming in BPF C, and allow programmers to build their own complex data structures flexibly out of basic building blocks. The key difference will be that such programs are verified to be safe, preserve runtime integrity of the system, and are proven to be bug free as far as the invariants of BPF specific APIs are concerned. One immediate use case that will be using the entire infrastructure this series is introducing will be managing percpu NMI safe linked lists inside BPF programs. The other use case this will serve in the near future will be linking kernel structures like XDP frame and sk_buff directly into user data structures (rbtree, pifomap, etc.) for packet queueing. This will follow single ownership concept included in this series. The user has complete control of the internal locking, and hence also the batching of operations for each critical section. The features are: - Allocated objects. - bpf_obj_new, bpf_obj_drop to allocate and free them. - Single ownership BPF linked lists. - Support for them in BPF maps. - Support for them in allocated objects. - Global spin locks. - Spin locks inside allocated objects. Some other notable things: - Completely static verification of locking. - Kfunc argument handling has been completely reworked. - Argument rewriting support for kfuncs. - A new bpf_experimental.h header as a dumping ground for these APIs. Any functionality exposed in this series is NOT part of UAPI. It is only available through use of kfuncs, and structs that can be added to map value may also change their size or name in the future. Hence, every feature in this series must be considered experimental. Follow-ups: ----------- * Support for kptrs (local and kernel) in local storage and percpu maps + kptr tests * Fixes for helper access checks rebasing on top of this series Next steps: ----------- * NMI safe percpu single ownership linked lists (using local_t protection). * Lockless linked lists. * Allow RCU protected BPF allocated objects. This then allows RCU protected list lookups, since spinlock protection for readers does not scale. * Introduce bpf_refcount for local kptrs, shared ownership. * Introduce shared ownership linked lists. * Documentation. Changelog: ---------- v9 -> v10 v9: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221117225510.1676785-1-memxor@gmail.com * Deduplicate code to find btf_record of reg (Alexei) * Add linked_list test to DENYLIST.aarch64 (Alexei) * Disable some linked list tests for now so that they compile with clang nightly (Alexei) v8 -> v9 v8: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221117162430.1213770-1-memxor@gmail.com * Fix up commit log of patch 2, Simplify patch 3 * Explain the implicit requirement of bpf_list_head requiring map BTF to match in btf_record_equal in a separate patch. v7 -> v8 v7: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221114191547.1694267-1-memxor@gmail.com * Fix early return in map_check_btf (Dan Carpenter) * Fix two memory leak bugs in local storage maps, outer maps * Address comments from Alexei and Dave * More local kptr -> allocated object renaming * Use krealloc with NULL instead kmalloc + krealloc * Drop WARN_ON_ONCE for field_offs parsing * Combine kfunc add + remove patches into one * Drop STRONG suffix from KF_ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR * Rename is_kfunc_arg_ret_buf_size to is_kfunc_arg_scalar_with_name * Remove redundant check for reg->type and arg type in it * Drop void * ret type check * Remove code duplication in checks for NULL pointer with offset != 0 * Fix two bpf_list_node typos * Improve log message for bpf_list_head operations * Improve comments for active_lock struct * Improve comments for Implementation details of process_spin_lock * Add Dave's acks v6 -> v7 v6: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221111193224.876706-1-memxor@gmail.com * Fix uninitialized variable warning (Dan Carpenter, Kernel Test Robot) * One more local_kptr renaming v5 -> v6 v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221107230950.7117-1-memxor@gmail.com * Replace (i && !off) check with next_off, include test (Andrii) * Drop local kptrs naming (Andrii, Alexei) * Drop reg->precise == EXACT patch (Andrii) * Add comment about ptr member of struct active_lock (Andrii) * Use btf__new_empty + btf__add_xxx APIs (Andrii) * Address other misc nits from Andrii v4 -> v5 v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221103191013.1236066-1-memxor@gmail.com * Add a lot more selftests (failure, success, runtime, BTF) * Make sure series is bisect friendly * Move list draining out of spin lock * This exposed an issue where bpf_mem_free can now be called in map_free path without migrate_disable, also fixed that. * Rename MEM_ALLOC -> MEM_RINGBUF, MEM_TYPE_LOCAL -> MEM_ALLOC (Alexei) * Group lock identity into a struct active_lock { ptr, id } (Dave) * Split set_release_on_unlock logic into separate patch (Alexei) v3 -> v4 v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221102202658.963008-1-memxor@gmail.com * Fix compiler error for !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL (Kernel Test Robot) * Fix error due to BUILD_BUG_ON on 32-bit platforms (Kernel Test Robot) v2 -> v3 v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221013062303.896469-1-memxor@gmail.com * Add ack from Dave for patch 5 * Rename btf_type_fields -> btf_record, btf_type_fields_off -> btf_field_offs, rename functions similarly (Alexei) * Remove 'kind' component from contains declaration tag (Alexei) * Move bpf_list_head, bpf_list_node definitions to UAPI bpf.h (Alexei) * Add note in commit log about modifying btf_struct_access API (Dave) * Downgrade WARN_ON_ONCE to verbose(env, "...") and return -EFAULT (Dave) * Add type_is_local_kptr wrapper to avoid noisy checks (Dave) * Remove unused flags parameter from bpf_kptr_new (Alexei) * Rename bpf_kptr_new -> bpf_obj_new, bpf_kptr_drop -> bpf_obj_drop (Alexei) * Reword comment in ref_obj_id_set_release_on_unlock (Dave) * Fix return type of ref_obj_id_set_release_on_unlock (Dave) * Introduce is_bpf_list_api_kfunc to dedup checks (Dave) * Disallow BPF_WRITE to untrusted local kptrs * Add details about soundness of check_reg_allocation_locked logic * List untrusted local kptrs for PROBE_MEM handling v1 -> v2 v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221011012240.3149-1-memxor@gmail.com * Rebase on bpf-next to resolve merge conflict in DENYLIST.s390x * Fix a couple of mental lapses in bpf_list_head_free RFC v1 -> v1 RFC v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220904204145.3089-1-memxor@gmail.com * Mostly a complete rewrite of BTF parsing, refactor existing code (Kartikeya) * Rebase kfunc rewrite for bpf-next, add support for more changes * Cache type metadata in BTF to avoid recomputation inside verifier (Kartikeya) * Remove __kernel tag, make things similar to map values, reserve bpf_ prefix * bpf_kptr_new, bpf_kptr_drop * Rename precision state enum values (Alexei) * Drop explicit constructor/destructor support (Alexei) * Rewrite code for constructing/destructing objects and offload to runtime * Minimize duplication in bpf_map_value_off_desc handling (Alexei) * Expose global memory allocator (Alexei) * Address other nits from Alexei * Split out local kptrs in maps, more kptrs in maps support into a follow up Links: ------ * Dave's BPF RB-Tree RFC series v1 (Discussion thread) https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220722183438.3319790-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com v2 (With support for static locks) https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com * BPF Linked Lists Discussion https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAP01T74U30+yeBHEgmgzTJ-XYxZ0zj71kqCDJtTH9YQNfTK+Xw@mail.gmail.com * BPF Memory Allocator from Alexei https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220902211058.60789-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com * BPF Memory Allocator UAPI Discussion https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d3f76b27f4e55ec9e400ae8dcaecbb702a4932e8.camel@fb.com ==================== Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c2
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c747
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c136
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spinlock.c45
4 files changed, 884 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
index c210657d4d0a..55d641c1f126 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static struct {
"arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern points to unsupported dynamic pointer type", 0},
{"not_valid_dynptr",
"arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern must be valid and initialized", 0},
- {"not_ptr_to_stack", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern not to stack", 0},
+ {"not_ptr_to_stack", "arg#0 expected pointer to stack", 0},
{"dynptr_data_null", NULL, -EBADMSG},
};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6170d36fe5fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
@@ -0,0 +1,747 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include <test_btf.h>
+#include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+
+#include "linked_list.skel.h"
+#include "linked_list_fail.skel.h"
+
+static char log_buf[1024 * 1024];
+
+static struct {
+ const char *prog_name;
+ const char *err_msg;
+} linked_list_fail_tests[] = {
+#define TEST(test, off) \
+ { #test "_missing_lock_push_front", \
+ "bpf_spin_lock at off=" #off " must be held for bpf_list_head" }, \
+ { #test "_missing_lock_push_back", \
+ "bpf_spin_lock at off=" #off " must be held for bpf_list_head" }, \
+ { #test "_missing_lock_pop_front", \
+ "bpf_spin_lock at off=" #off " must be held for bpf_list_head" }, \
+ { #test "_missing_lock_pop_back", \
+ "bpf_spin_lock at off=" #off " must be held for bpf_list_head" },
+ TEST(kptr, 32)
+/* FIXME
+ TEST(global, 16)
+*/
+ TEST(map, 0)
+ TEST(inner_map, 0)
+#undef TEST
+#define TEST(test, op) \
+ { #test "_kptr_incorrect_lock_" #op, \
+ "held lock and object are not in the same allocation\n" \
+ "bpf_spin_lock at off=32 must be held for bpf_list_head" }, \
+ { #test "_map_incorrect_lock_" #op, \
+ "held lock and object are not in the same allocation\n" \
+ "bpf_spin_lock at off=0 must be held for bpf_list_head" }, \
+ { #test "_inner_map_incorrect_lock_" #op, \
+ "held lock and object are not in the same allocation\n" \
+ "bpf_spin_lock at off=0 must be held for bpf_list_head" },
+ TEST(kptr, push_front)
+ TEST(kptr, push_back)
+ TEST(kptr, pop_front)
+ TEST(kptr, pop_back)
+ TEST(map, push_front)
+ TEST(map, push_back)
+ TEST(map, pop_front)
+ TEST(map, pop_back)
+ TEST(inner_map, push_front)
+ TEST(inner_map, push_back)
+ TEST(inner_map, pop_front)
+ TEST(inner_map, pop_back)
+#undef TEST
+/* FIXME
+ { "map_compat_kprobe", "tracing progs cannot use bpf_list_head yet" },
+ { "map_compat_kretprobe", "tracing progs cannot use bpf_list_head yet" },
+ { "map_compat_tp", "tracing progs cannot use bpf_list_head yet" },
+ { "map_compat_perf", "tracing progs cannot use bpf_list_head yet" },
+ { "map_compat_raw_tp", "tracing progs cannot use bpf_list_head yet" },
+ { "map_compat_raw_tp_w", "tracing progs cannot use bpf_list_head yet" },
+*/
+ { "obj_type_id_oor", "local type ID argument must be in range [0, U32_MAX]" },
+ { "obj_new_no_composite", "bpf_obj_new type ID argument must be of a struct" },
+ { "obj_new_no_struct", "bpf_obj_new type ID argument must be of a struct" },
+ { "obj_drop_non_zero_off", "R1 must have zero offset when passed to release func" },
+ { "new_null_ret", "R0 invalid mem access 'ptr_or_null_'" },
+ { "obj_new_acq", "Unreleased reference id=" },
+ { "use_after_drop", "invalid mem access 'scalar'" },
+ { "ptr_walk_scalar", "type=scalar expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+ { "direct_read_lock", "direct access to bpf_spin_lock is disallowed" },
+ { "direct_write_lock", "direct access to bpf_spin_lock is disallowed" },
+ { "direct_read_head", "direct access to bpf_list_head is disallowed" },
+ { "direct_write_head", "direct access to bpf_list_head is disallowed" },
+ { "direct_read_node", "direct access to bpf_list_node is disallowed" },
+ { "direct_write_node", "direct access to bpf_list_node is disallowed" },
+/* FIXME
+ { "write_after_push_front", "only read is supported" },
+ { "write_after_push_back", "only read is supported" },
+ { "use_after_unlock_push_front", "invalid mem access 'scalar'" },
+ { "use_after_unlock_push_back", "invalid mem access 'scalar'" },
+ { "double_push_front", "arg#1 expected pointer to allocated object" },
+ { "double_push_back", "arg#1 expected pointer to allocated object" },
+ { "no_node_value_type", "bpf_list_node not found at offset=0" },
+ { "incorrect_value_type",
+ "operation on bpf_list_head expects arg#1 bpf_list_node at offset=0 in struct foo, "
+ "but arg is at offset=0 in struct bar" },
+ { "incorrect_node_var_off", "variable ptr_ access var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff) disallowed" },
+ { "incorrect_node_off1", "bpf_list_node not found at offset=1" },
+ { "incorrect_node_off2", "arg#1 offset=40, but expected bpf_list_node at offset=0 in struct foo" },
+ { "no_head_type", "bpf_list_head not found at offset=0" },
+ { "incorrect_head_var_off1", "R1 doesn't have constant offset" },
+ { "incorrect_head_var_off2", "variable ptr_ access var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff) disallowed" },
+*/
+ { "incorrect_head_off1", "bpf_list_head not found at offset=17" },
+/* FIXME
+ { "incorrect_head_off2", "bpf_list_head not found at offset=1" },
+*/
+ { "pop_front_off",
+ "15: (bf) r1 = r6 ; R1_w=ptr_or_null_foo(id=4,ref_obj_id=4,off=40,imm=0) "
+ "R6_w=ptr_or_null_foo(id=4,ref_obj_id=4,off=40,imm=0) refs=2,4\n"
+ "16: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\nR1 type=ptr_or_null_ expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+ { "pop_back_off",
+ "15: (bf) r1 = r6 ; R1_w=ptr_or_null_foo(id=4,ref_obj_id=4,off=40,imm=0) "
+ "R6_w=ptr_or_null_foo(id=4,ref_obj_id=4,off=40,imm=0) refs=2,4\n"
+ "16: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\nR1 type=ptr_or_null_ expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+};
+
+static void test_linked_list_fail_prog(const char *prog_name, const char *err_msg)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts, .kernel_log_buf = log_buf,
+ .kernel_log_size = sizeof(log_buf),
+ .kernel_log_level = 1);
+ struct linked_list_fail *skel;
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ int ret;
+
+ skel = linked_list_fail__open_opts(&opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "linked_list_fail__open_opts"))
+ return;
+
+ prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
+ goto end;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
+
+ ret = linked_list_fail__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(ret, "linked_list_fail__load must fail"))
+ goto end;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(log_buf, err_msg), "expected error message")) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Expected: %s\n", err_msg);
+ fprintf(stderr, "Verifier: %s\n", log_buf);
+ }
+
+end:
+ linked_list_fail__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void clear_fields(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ char buf[24];
+ int key = 0;
+
+ memset(buf, 0xff, sizeof(buf));
+ ASSERT_OK(bpf_map__update_elem(map, &key, sizeof(key), buf, sizeof(buf), 0), "check_and_free_fields");
+}
+
+enum {
+ TEST_ALL,
+ PUSH_POP,
+ PUSH_POP_MULT,
+ LIST_IN_LIST,
+};
+
+static void test_linked_list_success(int mode, bool leave_in_map)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 1,
+ );
+ struct linked_list *skel;
+ int ret;
+
+ skel = linked_list__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "linked_list__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ if (mode == LIST_IN_LIST)
+ goto lil;
+ if (mode == PUSH_POP_MULT)
+ goto ppm;
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.map_list_push_pop), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "map_list_push_pop");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "map_list_push_pop retval");
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.array_map);
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.inner_map_list_push_pop), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "inner_map_list_push_pop");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "inner_map_list_push_pop retval");
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.inner_map);
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.global_list_push_pop), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "global_list_push_pop");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "global_list_push_pop retval");
+ /* FIXME:
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.data_A);
+ */
+
+ if (mode == PUSH_POP)
+ goto end;
+
+ppm:
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.map_list_push_pop_multiple), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "map_list_push_pop_multiple");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "map_list_push_pop_multiple retval");
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.array_map);
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.inner_map_list_push_pop_multiple), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "inner_map_list_push_pop_multiple");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "inner_map_list_push_pop_multiple retval");
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.inner_map);
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.global_list_push_pop_multiple), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "global_list_push_pop_multiple");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "global_list_push_pop_multiple retval");
+ /* FIXME:
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.data_A);
+ */
+
+ if (mode == PUSH_POP_MULT)
+ goto end;
+
+lil:
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.map_list_in_list), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "map_list_in_list");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "map_list_in_list retval");
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.array_map);
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.inner_map_list_in_list), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "inner_map_list_in_list");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "inner_map_list_in_list retval");
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.inner_map);
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.global_list_in_list), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "global_list_in_list");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "global_list_in_list retval");
+ /* FIXME:
+ if (!leave_in_map)
+ clear_fields(skel->maps.data_A);
+ */
+end:
+ linked_list__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+#define SPIN_LOCK 2
+#define LIST_HEAD 3
+#define LIST_NODE 4
+
+static struct btf *init_btf(void)
+{
+ int id, lid, hid, nid;
+ struct btf *btf;
+
+ btf = btf__new_empty();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "btf__new_empty"))
+ return NULL;
+ id = btf__add_int(btf, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 1, "btf__add_int"))
+ goto end;
+ lid = btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_spin_lock", 4);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(lid, SPIN_LOCK, "btf__add_struct bpf_spin_lock"))
+ goto end;
+ hid = btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_list_head", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(hid, LIST_HEAD, "btf__add_struct bpf_list_head"))
+ goto end;
+ nid = btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_list_node", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(nid, LIST_NODE, "btf__add_struct bpf_list_node"))
+ goto end;
+ return btf;
+end:
+ btf__free(btf);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void test_btf(void)
+{
+ struct btf *btf = NULL;
+ int id, err;
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: too many locks")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 32, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -E2BIG, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing lock")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:a", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:baz:a"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field baz::a"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: bad offset")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -EEXIST, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing contains:")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing struct")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:bar", 5, 1);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:bar"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOENT, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing node")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:c", 5, 1);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:c"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ btf__free(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOENT, "check btf");
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: node incorrect type")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:a", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:a"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 4);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: multiple bpf_list_node with name b")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 52);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "d", SPIN_LOCK, 384, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::d"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning | owned AA cycle")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning | owned ABA cycle")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 7, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning -> owned")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:a", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:a"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning -> owning | owned -> owned")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:a", 7, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:baz:a"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 9, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field baz:a"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning | owned -> owning | owned -> owned")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar:a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar:b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar:c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:a", 7, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:baz:a"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 9, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field baz:a"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning -> owning | owned -> owning | owned -> owned")) {
+ btf = init_btf();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:b", 7, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 36);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 9, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bam:a", 9, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 10, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bam:a"))
+ break;
+ id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bam", 16);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 11, "btf__add_struct bam"))
+ break;
+ err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bam::a"))
+ break;
+
+ err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+ btf__free(btf);
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+void test_linked_list(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(linked_list_fail_tests); i++) {
+ if (!test__start_subtest(linked_list_fail_tests[i].prog_name))
+ continue;
+ test_linked_list_fail_prog(linked_list_fail_tests[i].prog_name,
+ linked_list_fail_tests[i].err_msg);
+ }
+ test_btf();
+ test_linked_list_success(PUSH_POP, false);
+ test_linked_list_success(PUSH_POP, true);
+ test_linked_list_success(PUSH_POP_MULT, false);
+ test_linked_list_success(PUSH_POP_MULT, true);
+ test_linked_list_success(LIST_IN_LIST, false);
+ test_linked_list_success(LIST_IN_LIST, true);
+ test_linked_list_success(TEST_ALL, false);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..72282e92a78a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+
+#include "test_spin_lock.skel.h"
+#include "test_spin_lock_fail.skel.h"
+
+static char log_buf[1024 * 1024];
+
+static struct {
+ const char *prog_name;
+ const char *err_msg;
+} spin_lock_fail_tests[] = {
+ { "lock_id_kptr_preserve",
+ "5: (bf) r1 = r0 ; R0_w=ptr_foo(id=2,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) "
+ "R1_w=ptr_foo(id=2,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) refs=2\n6: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+ "R1 type=ptr_ expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+ { "lock_id_global_zero",
+ "; R1_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=4,imm=0)\n2: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+ "R1 type=map_value expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+ { "lock_id_mapval_preserve",
+ "8: (bf) r1 = r0 ; R0_w=map_value(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) "
+ "R1_w=map_value(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0)\n9: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+ "R1 type=map_value expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+ { "lock_id_innermapval_preserve",
+ "13: (bf) r1 = r0 ; R0=map_value(id=2,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) "
+ "R1_w=map_value(id=2,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0)\n14: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+ "R1 type=map_value expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_innermapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_global_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_global_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_global_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_global_innermapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_innermapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_innermapval1", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_innermapval2", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+ { "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+};
+
+static void test_spin_lock_fail_prog(const char *prog_name, const char *err_msg)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts, .kernel_log_buf = log_buf,
+ .kernel_log_size = sizeof(log_buf),
+ .kernel_log_level = 1);
+ struct test_spin_lock_fail *skel;
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ int ret;
+
+ skel = test_spin_lock_fail__open_opts(&opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_spin_lock_fail__open_opts"))
+ return;
+
+ prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
+ goto end;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
+
+ ret = test_spin_lock_fail__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(ret, "test_spin_lock_fail__load must fail"))
+ goto end;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(log_buf, err_msg), "expected error message")) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Expected: %s\n", err_msg);
+ fprintf(stderr, "Verifier: %s\n", log_buf);
+ }
+
+end:
+ test_spin_lock_fail__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg)
+{
+ int err, prog_fd = *(u32 *) arg;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 10000,
+ );
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+ ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run retval");
+ pthread_exit(arg);
+}
+
+void test_spin_lock_success(void)
+{
+ struct test_spin_lock *skel;
+ pthread_t thread_id[4];
+ int prog_fd, i;
+ void *ret;
+
+ skel = test_spin_lock__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_spin_lock__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bpf_spin_lock_test);
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ int err;
+
+ err = pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL, &spin_lock_thread, &prog_fd);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_join(thread_id[i], &ret), "pthread_join"))
+ goto end;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, &prog_fd, "ret == prog_fd"))
+ goto end;
+ }
+end:
+ test_spin_lock__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_spin_lock(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ test_spin_lock_success();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spin_lock_fail_tests); i++) {
+ if (!test__start_subtest(spin_lock_fail_tests[i].prog_name))
+ continue;
+ test_spin_lock_fail_prog(spin_lock_fail_tests[i].prog_name,
+ spin_lock_fail_tests[i].err_msg);
+ }
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spinlock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spinlock.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 15eb1372d771..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spinlock.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-#include <test_progs.h>
-#include <network_helpers.h>
-
-static void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg)
-{
- int err, prog_fd = *(u32 *) arg;
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
- .data_in = &pkt_v4,
- .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
- .repeat = 10000,
- );
-
- err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
- ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
- ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run retval");
- pthread_exit(arg);
-}
-
-void test_spinlock(void)
-{
- const char *file = "./test_spin_lock.bpf.o";
- pthread_t thread_id[4];
- struct bpf_object *obj = NULL;
- int prog_fd;
- int err = 0, i;
- void *ret;
-
- err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, &obj, &prog_fd);
- if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
- printf("test_spin_lock:bpf_prog_test_load errno %d\n", errno);
- goto close_prog;
- }
- for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
- if (CHECK_FAIL(pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL,
- &spin_lock_thread, &prog_fd)))
- goto close_prog;
-
- for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
- if (CHECK_FAIL(pthread_join(thread_id[i], &ret) ||
- ret != (void *)&prog_fd))
- goto close_prog;
-close_prog:
- bpf_object__close(obj);
-}