aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_array_init.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQu Wenruo <[email protected]>2024-12-04 13:30:46 +1030
committerDavid Sterba <[email protected]>2024-12-17 19:54:32 +0100
commitdfb92681a19e1d5172420baa242806414b3eff6f (patch)
treee41a70b4d38cdf17fd4831a52d536dfa1d934cac /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_array_init.c
parentbe691b5e593f2cc8cef67bbc59c1fb91b74a86a9 (diff)
btrfs: tree-checker: reject inline extent items with 0 ref count
[BUG] There is a bug report in the mailing list where btrfs_run_delayed_refs() failed to drop the ref count for logical 25870311358464 num_bytes 2113536. The involved leaf dump looks like this: item 166 key (25870311358464 168 2113536) itemoff 10091 itemsize 50 extent refs 1 gen 84178 flags 1 ref#0: shared data backref parent 32399126528000 count 0 <<< ref#1: shared data backref parent 31808973717504 count 1 Notice the count number is 0. [CAUSE] There is no concrete evidence yet, but considering 0 -> 1 is also a single bit flipped, it's possible that hardware memory bitflip is involved, causing the on-disk extent tree to be corrupted. [FIX] To prevent us reading such corrupted extent item, or writing such damaged extent item back to disk, enhance the handling of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_DATA_REF_KEY keys for both inlined and key items, to detect such 0 ref count and reject them. CC: [email protected] # 5.4+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ Reported-by: Frankie Fisher <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_array_init.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions