mm: avoid using vma_merge() for new VMAs

Abstract vma_merge_new_vma() to use vma_merge_struct and rename the
resultant function vma_merge_new_range() to be clear what the purpose of
this function is - a new VMA is desired in the specified range, and we
wish to see if it is possible to 'merge' surrounding VMAs into this range
rather than having to allocate a new VMA.

Note that this function uses vma_extend() exclusively, so adopts its
requirement that the iterator point at or before the gap.  We add an
assert to this effect.

This is as opposed to vma_merge_existing_range(), which will be introduced
in a subsequent commit, and provide the same functionality for cases in
which we are modifying an existing VMA.

In mmap_region() and do_brk_flags() we open code scenarios where we prefer
to use vma_expand() rather than invoke a full vma_merge() operation.

Abstract this logic and eliminate all of the open-coding, and also use the
same logic for all cases where we add new VMAs to, rather than ultimately
use vma_merge(), rather use vma_expand().

Doing so removes duplication and simplifies VMA merging in all such cases,
laying the ground for us to eliminate the merging of new VMAs in
vma_merge() altogether.

Also add the ability for the vmg to track state, and able to report
errors, allowing for us to differentiate a failed merge from an inability
to allocate memory in callers.

This makes it far easier to understand what is happening in these cases
avoiding confusion, bugs and allowing for future optimisation.

Also introduce vma_iter_next_rewind() to allow for retrieval of the next,
and (optionally) the prev VMA, rewinding to the start of the previous gap.

Introduce are_anon_vmas_compatible() to abstract individual VMA anon_vma
comparison for the case of merging on both sides where the anon_vma of the
VMA being merged maybe compatible with prev and next, but prev and next's
anon_vma's may not be compatible with each other.

Finally also introduce can_vma_merge_left() / can_vma_merge_right() to
check adjacent VMA compatibility and that they are indeed adjacent.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/49d37c0769b6b9dc03b27fe4d059173832556392.1725040657.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: Bert Karwatzki <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions