mm/memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES

It's recommended to use NUMA_NO_NODE everywhere to select "process any
node" behavior or to indicate that "no node id specified".

Hence, update __next_free_mem_range*() API's to accept both NUMA_NO_NODE
and MAX_NUMNODES, but emit warning once on MAX_NUMNODES, and correct
corresponding API's documentation to describe new behavior.  Also,
update other memblock/nobootmem APIs where MAX_NUMNODES is used
dirrectly.

The change was suggested by Tejun Heo.

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions