aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/syscall-counts.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>2022-10-18 15:40:08 +0300
committerMark Brown <[email protected]>2022-10-18 19:16:45 +0100
commit010c050fe9ea263e3fc17493822117610a23f662 (patch)
treec0edc16d331695cae538da5f16d318d88bf9c5f8 /tools/perf/scripts/python/syscall-counts.py
parent483e4cdfb502e6bea6b0a226a3ff7c22e60153de (diff)
ASoC: SOF: Intel: ipc4: Ack a received reply or notification separately
By acking a received message we tell the DSP that we have processed the message (reply or notification) and we are open to receive a new one. The original implementation did this in a common code after the received message got handled as reply or notification. With right timing this opens up a small window when we have processed the reply and let the other thread proceed to send a new message to the DSP, which is allowed as the DSP is free to receive message. But when the message is received and processed by the DSP and it wants to send a reply it will still see that the previous message has not been acked, so it fails to send a reply. Later the first reply got acked by the kernel, but it is too late and the in-flight message got a timeout due to firmware not responding (which it tried, but could not). Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/syscall-counts.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions