mempolicy trivia: slightly more consistent naming

Before getting down to work, do a little cleanup, mainly of inconsistent
variable naming.  I gave up trying to rationalize mpol versus pol versus
policy, and node versus nid, but let's avoid p and nd.  Remove a few
superfluous blank lines, but add one; and here prefer vma->vm_policy to
vma_policy(vma) - the latter being appropriate in other sources, which
have to allow for !CONFIG_NUMA.  That intriguing line about KERNEL_DS? 
should have gone in v2.6.15, when numa_policy_init() stopped using
set_mempolicy(2)'s system call handler.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <[email protected]>
Cc: Nhat Pham <[email protected]>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions