diff options
author | Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> | 2023-10-23 23:38:41 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <[email protected]> | 2023-10-25 16:47:14 -0700 |
commit | b1454b463c217e5bc553acc44b2389d9257c9708 (patch) | |
tree | d6fd21b602184f797eb246bce240a4ad23df0690 /tools/perf/scripts/python/stackcollapse.py | |
parent | 1cbf0a58847b30507611f92ad69964ef37264d14 (diff) |
mm: mlock: avoid folio_within_range() on KSM pages
Since commit dc68badcede4 ("mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle
large folio") I've just occasionally seen VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_ksm)
warnings from folio_within_range(), in a splurge after testing with KSM
hyperactive.
folio_referenced_one()'s use of folio_within_vma() is safe because it
checks folio_test_large() first; but allow_mlock_munlock() needs to do the
same to avoid those warnings (or check !folio_test_ksm() itself? Or move
either check into folio_within_range()? Hard to tell without more
examples of its use).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: dc68badcede4 ("mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle large folio")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yin Fengwei <[email protected]>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/stackcollapse.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions