diff options
author | Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> | 2019-10-28 23:35:13 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> | 2019-11-01 14:40:26 -0700 |
commit | 77b094305b1ba23e716bb34d3e33c8fe30a5f487 (patch) | |
tree | 736c38d8395678aafdc871009a0a4c488fa4fff4 /tools/perf/scripts/python/net_dropmonitor.py | |
parent | 853b53520c9d11db7652e3603665b0ad475741a5 (diff) |
net/mlx5: Tide up state_lock and vport enabled flag usage
When eswitch is disabled, vport event handler is unregistered.
This unregistration already synchronizes with running EQ event handler
in below code flow.
mlx5_eswitch_disable()
mlx5_eswitch_event_handlers_unregister()
mlx5_eq_notifier_unregister()
atomic_notifier_chain_unregister()
synchronize_rcu()
notifier_callchain
eswitch_vport_event()
queue_work()
Additionally vport->enabled flag is set under state_lock during
esw_enable_vport() but is not read under state_lock in
(a) esw_disable_vport() and (b) under atomic context
eswitch_vport_event().
It is also necessary to synchronize with already scheduled vport event.
This is already achieved using below sequence.
mlx5_eswitch_event_handlers_unregister()
[..]
flush_workqueue()
Hence,
(a) Remove vport->enabled check in eswitch_vport_event() which
doesn't make any sense.
(b) Remove redundant flush_workqueue() on every vport disable.
(c) Keep esw_disable_vport() symmetric with esw_enable_vport() for
state_lock.
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Vu Pham <vuhuong@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/net_dropmonitor.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions