pgtable: improve pte_protnone() comment

Especially the "For PROT_NONE VMAs, the PTEs are not marked
_PAGE_PROTNONE" part is wrong: doing an mprotect(PROT_NONE) will end up
marking all PTEs on x86_64 as _PAGE_PROTNONE, making pte_protnone()
indicate "yes".

So let's improve the comment, so it's easier to grasp which semantics
pte_protnone() actually has.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Cc: John Hubbard <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: liubo <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions