scsi: iscsi: Use system_unbound_wq for destroy_work

Use the system_unbound_wq for async session destruction. We don't need a
dedicated workqueue for async session destruction because:

 1. perf does not seem to be an issue since we only allow 1 active work.

 2. it does not have deps with other system works and we can run them in
    parallel with each other.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions