bpf: Fix precision tracking for BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE | BPF_END

BPF_END and BPF_NEG has a different specification for the source bit in
the opcode compared to other ALU/ALU64 instructions, and is either
reserved or use to specify the byte swap endianness. In both cases the
source bit does not encode source operand location, and src_reg is a
reserved field.

backtrack_insn() currently does not differentiate BPF_END and BPF_NEG
from other ALU/ALU64 instructions, which leads to r0 being incorrectly
marked as precise when processing BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE | BPF_END
instructions. This commit teaches backtrack_insn() to correctly mark
precision for such case.

While precise tracking of BPF_NEG and other BPF_END instructions are
correct and does not need fixing, this commit opt to process all BPF_NEG
and BPF_END instructions within the same if-clause to better align with
current convention used in the verifier (e.g. check_alu_op).

Fixes: b5dc0163d8fd ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Mohamed Mahmoud <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tao Lyu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions