aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/call-graph-from-sql.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Zijlstra <[email protected]>2017-08-23 12:52:32 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <[email protected]>2017-08-25 11:06:32 +0200
commita1d14934ea4b9db816a8dbfeab1c3e7204a0d871 (patch)
treef2d6a33fdf8eed83fbe4e2d04c7989700aab2138 /tools/perf/scripts/python/call-graph-from-sql.py
parente91498589746065e3ae95d9a00b068e525eec34f (diff)
workqueue/lockdep: 'Fix' flush_work() annotation
The flush_work() annotation as introduced by commit: e159489baa71 ("workqueue: relax lockdep annotation on flush_work()") hits on the lockdep problem with recursive read locks. The situation as described is: Work W1: Work W2: Task: ARR(Q) ARR(Q) flush_workqueue(Q) A(W1) A(W2) A(Q) flush_work(W2) R(Q) A(W2) R(W2) if (special) A(Q) else ARR(Q) R(Q) where: A - acquire, ARR - acquire-read-recursive, R - release. Where under 'special' conditions we want to trigger a lock recursion deadlock, but otherwise allow the flush_work(). The allowing is done by using recursive read locks (ARR), but lockdep is broken for recursive stuff. However, there appears to be no need to acquire the lock if we're not 'special', so if we remove the 'else' clause things become much simpler and no longer need the recursion thing at all. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/call-graph-from-sql.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions