staging: vchiq_arm: tidy up service function naming

During a recent review Dan Carpenter reported that the function naming of
(un)lock_service is misleading. They are like wrapper around kref_get /
kref_put and don't have anything to do with locking. So use a name which
represent more the actual behavior. Btw add the vchiq prefix to avoid
possible name conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions