aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-record
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>2019-01-03 15:27:09 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <[email protected]>2019-01-04 13:13:46 -0800
commit76699a67f3041ff4c7af6d6ee9be2bfbf1ffb671 (patch)
tree5d42b50be630e856b4e91c3109b56d8e4612a594 /tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-record
parent4e0982a00564c80cb849a892043450860ef91e14 (diff)
fs/epoll: drop ovflist branch prediction
The ep->ovflist is a secondary ready-list to temporarily store events that might occur when doing sproc without holding the ep->wq.lock. This accounts for every time we check for ready events and also send events back to userspace; both callbacks, particularly the latter because of copy_to_user, can account for a non-trivial time. As such, the unlikely() check to see if the pointer is being used, seems both misleading and sub-optimal. In fact, we go to an awful lot of trouble to sync both lists, and populating the ovflist is far from an uncommon scenario. For example, profiling a concurrent epoll_wait(2) benchmark, with CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES shows that for a two threads a 33% incorrect rate was seen; and when incrementally increasing the number of epoll instances (which is used, for example for multiple queuing load balancing models), up to a 90% incorrect rate was seen. Similarly, by deleting the prediction, 3% throughput boost was seen across incremental threads. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Baron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-record')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions