diff options
| author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> | 2020-10-07 11:04:49 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alex Deucher <[email protected]> | 2020-10-09 14:43:29 -0400 |
| commit | 737123d67e02fdd6597aaac168e0c17e984c4234 (patch) | |
| tree | c120db738e4f2b3436b3b98f46a63ac7bc89d41e /tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-record | |
| parent | e0af7d1110121abe9801ff2b8411537332b24cd1 (diff) | |
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433e.pXkC6KsN6HN%2FLdhj%[email protected]/
Acked-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-record')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions