diff options
author | Michal Hocko <[email protected]> | 2015-02-27 15:51:46 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> | 2015-02-28 09:57:51 -0800 |
commit | 4e54dede38b45052a941bcf709f7d29f2e18174d (patch) | |
tree | 4640490752366d061856ce0632fa94ae8a45b1fc /scripts/gdb/linux | |
parent | da616534ed7f6e8ffaab699258b55c8d78d0b4ea (diff) |
memcg: fix low limit calculation
A memcg is considered low limited even when the current usage is equal to
the low limit. This leads to interesting side effects e.g.
groups/hierarchies with no memory accounted are considered protected and
so the reclaim will emit MEMCG_LOW event when encountering them.
Another and much bigger issue was reported by Joonsoo Kim. He has hit a
NULL ptr dereference with the legacy cgroup API which even doesn't have
low limit exposed. The limit is 0 by default but the initial check fails
for memcg with 0 consumption and parent_mem_cgroup() would return NULL if
use_hierarchy is 0 and so page_counter_read would try to dereference NULL.
I suppose that the current implementation is just an overlook because the
documentation in Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt says:
"The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
ancestors are below their low boundaries"
Fix the usage and the low limit comparision in mem_cgroup_low accordingly.
Fixes: 241994ed8649 (mm: memcontrol: default hierarchy interface for memory)
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/gdb/linux')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions