diff options
author | Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> | 2023-09-08 16:33:52 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2023-09-11 08:32:30 +0100 |
commit | 86899e9e1e29e854b5f6dcc24ba4f75f792c89aa (patch) | |
tree | 384540272566daf3c11747801d9f7a0ed78697c5 /scripts/gdb/linux/vmalloc.py | |
parent | ea32690daf4fa525dc5a4d164bd00ed8c756e1c6 (diff) |
net: dsa: sja1105: block FDB accesses that are concurrent with a switch reset
Currently, when we add the first sja1105 port to a bridge with
vlan_filtering 1, then we sometimes see this output:
sja1105 spi2.2: port 4 failed to read back entry for be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 3088: -ENOENT
sja1105 spi2.2: Reset switch and programmed static config. Reason: VLAN filtering
sja1105 spi2.2: port 0 failed to add be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 0 to fdb: -2
It is because sja1105_fdb_add() runs from the dsa_owq which is no longer
serialized with switch resets since it dropped the rtnl_lock() in the
blamed commit.
Either performing the FDB accesses before the reset, or after the reset,
is equally fine, because sja1105_static_fdb_change() backs up those
changes in the static config, but FDB access during reset isn't ok.
Make sja1105_static_config_reload() take the fdb_lock to fix that.
Fixes: 0faf890fc519 ("net: dsa: drop rtnl_lock from dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/gdb/linux/vmalloc.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions