aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/gdb/linux/timerlist.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJuergen Gross <[email protected]>2021-08-27 14:32:06 +0200
committerJuergen Gross <[email protected]>2021-09-14 09:53:48 +0200
commit8480ed9c2bbd56fc86524998e5f2e3e22f5038f6 (patch)
tree0436a0f5f79f1ae51e6816d13443b67bb5e54477 /scripts/gdb/linux/timerlist.py
parent58e636039b512697554b579c2bb23774061877f5 (diff)
xen/balloon: use a kernel thread instead a workqueue
Today the Xen ballooning is done via delayed work in a workqueue. This might result in workqueue hangups being reported in case of large amounts of memory are being ballooned in one go (here 16GB): BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=6 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 64s! Showing busy workqueues and worker pools: workqueue events: flags=0x0 pwq 12: cpus=6 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=2/256 refcnt=3 in-flight: 229:balloon_process pending: cache_reap workqueue events_freezable_power_: flags=0x84 pwq 12: cpus=6 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2 pending: disk_events_workfn workqueue mm_percpu_wq: flags=0x8 pwq 12: cpus=6 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2 pending: vmstat_update pool 12: cpus=6 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 hung=64s workers=3 idle: 2222 43 This can easily be avoided by using a dedicated kernel thread for doing the ballooning work. Reported-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/gdb/linux/timerlist.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions