diff options
| author | Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> | 2007-08-30 23:56:35 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> | 2007-08-31 01:42:23 -0700 |
| commit | 60187d2708caa870f0825d753df1612ea688eb9e (patch) | |
| tree | 35bbae1a2cdc1887ea1d85aa9c03ec0415dc5912 /net/lapb/lapb_out.c | |
| parent | 99db67bc04af0f2e8cb710ac92aaeb9af135a7c6 (diff) | |
sigqueue_free: fix the race with collect_signal()
Spotted by taoyue <[email protected]> and Jeremy Katz <[email protected]>.
collect_signal: sigqueue_free:
list_del_init(&first->list);
if (!list_empty(&q->list)) {
// not taken
}
q->flags &= ~SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC;
__sigqueue_free(first); __sigqueue_free(q);
Now, __sigqueue_free() is called twice on the same "struct sigqueue" with the
obviously bad implications.
In particular, this double free breaks the array_cache->avail logic, so the
same sigqueue could be "allocated" twice, and the bug can manifest itself via
the "impossible" BUG_ON(!SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) in sigqueue_free/send_sigqueue.
Hopefully this can explain these mysterious bug-reports, see
http://marc.info/?t=118766926500003
http://marc.info/?t=118466273000005
Alexey Dobriyan reports this patch makes the difference for the testcase, but
nobody has an access to the application which opened the problems originally.
Also, this patch removes tasklist lock/unlock, ->siglock is enough.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: taoyue <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeremy Katz <[email protected]>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/lapb/lapb_out.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions