mm/huge_memory: fix comment of page_deferred_list

The current comment is confusing because if global or memcg deferred list
in the second tail page is occupied by compound_head, why we still use
page[2].deferred_list here? I think it wants to say that Global or memcg
deferred list in the first tail page is occupied by compound_mapcount and
compound_pincount so we use the second tail page's deferred_list instead.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions