diff options
author | Bo Yan <byan@nvidia.com> | 2018-01-23 13:57:55 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2018-02-05 11:03:33 +0100 |
commit | 703cbaa601ff3fb554d1246c336ba727cc083ea0 (patch) | |
tree | 1d6c54f84f12ed6de8b299cb6b5976c504e40550 /mm/mmzone.c | |
parent | 7f3fdd40a7dfaa7405185250974b0fabd08c1f8b (diff) |
cpufreq: Skip cpufreq resume if it's not suspended
cpufreq_resume can be called even without preceding cpufreq_suspend.
This can happen in following scenario:
suspend_devices_and_enter
--> dpm_suspend_start
--> dpm_prepare
--> device_prepare : this function errors out
--> dpm_suspend: this is skipped due to dpm_prepare failure
this means cpufreq_suspend is skipped over
--> goto Recover_platform, due to previous error
--> goto Resume_devices
--> dpm_resume_end
--> dpm_resume
--> cpufreq_resume
In case schedutil is used as frequency governor, cpufreq_resume will
eventually call sugov_start, which does following:
memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
....
This effectively erases function pointer for frequency update, causing
crash later on. The function pointer would have been set correctly if
subsequent cpufreq_add_update_util_hook runs successfully, but that
function returns earlier because cpufreq_suspend was not called:
if (WARN_ON(per_cpu(cpufreq_update_util_data, cpu)))
return;
The fix is to check cpufreq_suspended first, if it's false, that means
cpufreq_suspend was not called in the first place, so do not resume
cpufreq.
Signed-off-by: Bo Yan <byan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Dropped printing a message ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mmzone.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions