arm64: alternatives: use cpucap naming

To more clearly align the various users of the cpucap enumeration, this patch
changes the alternative code to use the term `cpucap` in favour of `feature`.
The alternative_has_feature_{likely,unlikely}() functions are renamed to
alternative_has_cap_<likely,unlikely}() to more clearly align with the
cpus_have_{const_,}cap() helpers.

At the same time remove the stale comment referring to the "ARM64_CB
bit", which is evidently a typo for ARM64_CB_PATCH, which was removed in
commit:

  4c0bd995d73ed889 ("arm64: alternatives: have callbacks take a cap")

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch; this is
purely a renaming exercise.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions