aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/mpi/mpi-cmp.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>2017-02-22 15:44:55 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <[email protected]>2017-02-22 16:41:29 -0800
commit46acef048a6568ba490f636db8682a1461ed223c (patch)
tree7efc7b456db2e0b3df833f895d409bf20efa8646 /lib/mpi/mpi-cmp.c
parentb92df1de5d289c0b5d653e72414bf0850b8511e0 (diff)
mm,compaction: serialize waitqueue_active() checks
Without a memory barrier, the following race can occur with a high-order allocation: wakeup_kcompactd(order == 1) kcompactd() [L] waitqueue_active(kcompactd_wait) [S] prepare_to_wait_event(kcompactd_wait) [L] (kcompactd_max_order == 0) [S] kcompactd_max_order = order; schedule() Where the waitqueue_active() check is speculatively re-ordered to before setting the actual condition (max_order), not seeing the threads that's going to block; making us miss a wakeup. There are a couple of options to fix this, including calling wq_has_sleepers() which adds a full barrier, or unconditionally doing the wake_up_interruptible() and serialize on the q->lock. However, to make use of the control dependency, we just need to add L->L guarantees. While this bug is theoretical, there have been other offenders of the lockless waitqueue_active() in the past -- this is also documented in the call itself. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/mpi/mpi-cmp.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions