diff options
author | Mika Westerberg <[email protected]> | 2011-06-11 08:39:58 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <[email protected]> | 2011-06-11 16:25:16 -0700 |
commit | f1c089e3192f1afdfa76226dc38ef81b08ac810d (patch) | |
tree | e3968efef6b98608e5a49edf6c84097ff066badd /lib/cpu-notifier-error-inject.c | |
parent | 1f758a4341ac83289a549e6ba2d29a08cf639717 (diff) |
net: ep93xx_eth: fix DMA API violations
Russell King said:
>
> So, to summarize what its doing:
>
> 1. It allocates buffers for rx and tx.
> 2. It maps them with dma_map_single().
> This transfers ownership of the buffer to the DMA device.
> 3. In ep93xx_xmit,
> 3a. It copies the data into the buffer with skb_copy_and_csum_dev()
> This violates the DMA buffer ownership rules - the CPU should
> not be writing to this buffer while it is (in principle) owned
> by the DMA device.
> 3b. It then calls dma_sync_single_for_cpu() for the buffer.
> This transfers ownership of the buffer to the CPU, which surely
> is the wrong direction.
> 4. In ep93xx_rx,
> 4a. It calls dma_sync_single_for_cpu() for the buffer.
> This at least transfers the DMA buffer ownership to the CPU
> before the CPU reads the buffer
> 4b. It then uses skb_copy_to_linear_data() to copy the data out.
> At no point does it transfer ownership back to the DMA device.
> 5. When the driver is removed, it dma_unmap_single()'s the buffer.
> This transfers ownership of the buffer to the CPU.
> 6. It frees the buffer.
>
> While it may work on ep93xx, it's not respecting the DMA API rules,
> and with DMA debugging enabled it will probably encounter quite a few
> warnings.
This patch fixes these violations.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Petr Stetiar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/cpu-notifier-error-inject.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions