diff options
| author | David Rientjes <[email protected]> | 2015-04-14 15:47:01 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> | 2015-04-14 16:49:03 -0700 |
| commit | 6e276d2a517fba71a2be2252fdffb237e746e784 (patch) | |
| tree | 36e99835635803087a46f8f8b5475c7b69a28d13 /kernel | |
| parent | 5265047ac30191ea24b16503165000c225f54feb (diff) | |
kernel, cpuset: remove exception for __GFP_THISNODE
Nothing calls __cpuset_node_allowed() with __GFP_THISNODE set anymore, so
remove the obscure comment about it and its special-case exception.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Pravin Shelar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]>
Cc: Li Zefan <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Thelen <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/cpuset.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c index c68f0721df10..ee14e3a35a29 100644 --- a/kernel/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c @@ -2453,20 +2453,12 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs) * @node: is this an allowed node? * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags * - * If we're in interrupt, yes, we can always allocate. If __GFP_THISNODE is - * set, yes, we can always allocate. If node is in our task's mems_allowed, - * yes. If it's not a __GFP_HARDWALL request and this node is in the nearest - * hardwalled cpuset ancestor to this task's cpuset, yes. If the task has been - * OOM killed and has access to memory reserves as specified by the TIF_MEMDIE - * flag, yes. + * If we're in interrupt, yes, we can always allocate. If @node is set in + * current's mems_allowed, yes. If it's not a __GFP_HARDWALL request and this + * node is set in the nearest hardwalled cpuset ancestor to current's cpuset, + * yes. If current has access to memory reserves due to TIF_MEMDIE, yes. * Otherwise, no. * - * The __GFP_THISNODE placement logic is really handled elsewhere, - * by forcibly using a zonelist starting at a specified node, and by - * (in get_page_from_freelist()) refusing to consider the zones for - * any node on the zonelist except the first. By the time any such - * calls get to this routine, we should just shut up and say 'yes'. - * * GFP_USER allocations are marked with the __GFP_HARDWALL bit, * and do not allow allocations outside the current tasks cpuset * unless the task has been OOM killed as is marked TIF_MEMDIE. @@ -2502,7 +2494,7 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask) int allowed; /* is allocation in zone z allowed? */ unsigned long flags; - if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE)) + if (in_interrupt()) return 1; if (node_isset(node, current->mems_allowed)) return 1; |