diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> | 2017-04-21 12:42:03 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> | 2017-05-15 10:15:19 +0200 |
| commit | 3067a33d5fec856bb297d58e7f03411d060ccdee (patch) | |
| tree | 5ba9939e301781423396ac7db1c9d764f7dfec51 /kernel | |
| parent | ac1e843f0900bea92fcb47f6205e1f9ffb0d469c (diff) | |
sched/clock: Remove watchdog touching
Commit:
2bacec8c318c ("sched: touch softlockup watchdog after idling")
introduced the touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched() call without
justification and I feel sched_clock management is not the right
place, it should only be concerned with producing semi coherent time.
If this causes watchdog thingies, we can find a better place.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/clock.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c index 750a92c9db7e..c30c05f05d6f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/clock.c +++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c @@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ void sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(void) return; sched_clock_tick(); - touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event); |