diff options
author | David S. Miller <[email protected]> | 2023-09-17 15:12:06 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <[email protected]> | 2023-09-17 15:12:06 +0100 |
commit | 685c6d5b2ccbf2d93cbe580391f62ceaabf72f33 (patch) | |
tree | d299040339bd8120fb532bda7207b14ad48338fc /kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | |
parent | fbb49deb2103f70d2bc7dc7e79e5bfe33a3824ab (diff) | |
parent | ec6f1b4db95b7eedb3fe85f4f14e08fa0e9281c3 (diff) |
Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 73 non-merge commits during the last 9 day(s) which contain
a total of 79 files changed, 5275 insertions(+), 600 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Basic BTF validation in libbpf, from Andrii Nakryiko.
2) bpf_assert(), bpf_throw(), exceptions in bpf progs, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
3) next_thread cleanups, from Oleg Nesterov.
4) Add mcpu=v4 support to arm32, from Puranjay Mohan.
5) Add support for __percpu pointers in bpf progs, from Yonghong Song.
6) Fix bpf tailcall interaction with bpf trampoline, from Leon Hwang.
7) Raise irq_work in bpf_mem_alloc while irqs are disabled to improve refill probabablity, from Hou Tao.
Please consider pulling these changes from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
Thanks a lot!
Also thanks to reporters, reviewers and testers of commits in this pull-request:
Alan Maguire, Andrey Konovalov, Dave Marchevsky, "Eric W. Biederman",
Jiri Olsa, Maciej Fijalkowski, Quentin Monnet, Russell King (Oracle),
Song Liu, Stanislav Fomichev, Yonghong Song
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c index fdc3e8705a3c..db6176fb64dc 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c @@ -615,7 +615,10 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map) if (st_map->links) bpf_struct_ops_map_put_progs(st_map); bpf_map_area_free(st_map->links); - bpf_jit_free_exec(st_map->image); + if (st_map->image) { + bpf_jit_free_exec(st_map->image); + bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE); + } bpf_map_area_free(st_map->uvalue); bpf_map_area_free(st_map); } @@ -657,6 +660,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map; const struct btf_type *t, *vt; struct bpf_map *map; + int ret; st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id); if (!st_ops) @@ -681,12 +685,27 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) st_map->st_ops = st_ops; map = &st_map->map; + ret = bpf_jit_charge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE); + if (ret) { + __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } + + st_map->image = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE); + if (!st_map->image) { + /* __bpf_struct_ops_map_free() uses st_map->image as flag + * for "charged or not". In this case, we need to unchange + * here. + */ + bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE); + __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map); + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + } st_map->uvalue = bpf_map_area_alloc(vt->size, NUMA_NO_NODE); st_map->links = bpf_map_area_alloc(btf_type_vlen(t) * sizeof(struct bpf_links *), NUMA_NO_NODE); - st_map->image = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE); - if (!st_map->uvalue || !st_map->links || !st_map->image) { + if (!st_map->uvalue || !st_map->links) { __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); } @@ -907,4 +926,3 @@ err_out: kfree(link); return err; } - |