Merge branch 'for-linus-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs

Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
 "We have a good sized cleanup of our internal read ahead code, and the
  first series of commits from Chandan to enable PAGE_SIZE > sectorsize

  Otherwise, it's a normal series of cleanups and fixes, with many
  thanks to Dave Sterba for doing most of the patch wrangling this time"

* 'for-linus-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (82 commits)
  btrfs: make sure we stay inside the bvec during __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums
  btrfs: Fix misspellings in comments.
  btrfs: Print Warning only if ENOSPC_DEBUG is enabled
  btrfs: scrub: silence an uninitialized variable warning
  btrfs: move btrfs_compression_type to compression.h
  btrfs: rename btrfs_print_info to btrfs_print_mod_info
  Btrfs: Show a warning message if one of objectid reaches its highest value
  Documentation: btrfs: remove usage specific information
  btrfs: use kbasename in btrfsic_mount
  Btrfs: do not collect ordered extents when logging that inode exists
  Btrfs: fix race when checking if we can skip fsync'ing an inode
  Btrfs: fix listxattrs not listing all xattrs packed in the same item
  Btrfs: fix deadlock between direct IO reads and buffered writes
  Btrfs: fix extent_same allowing destination offset beyond i_size
  Btrfs: fix file loss on log replay after renaming a file and fsync
  Btrfs: fix unreplayable log after snapshot delete + parent dir fsync
  Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace
  btrfs: drop unused argument in btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features
  btrfs: add GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES to the control device ioctls
  btrfs: change max_inline default to 2048
  ...

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index e2287c7c10be..53e12977bfd0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4838,7 +4838,7 @@ static inline int need_do_async_reclaim(struct btrfs_space_info *space_info,
 	u64 thresh = div_factor_fine(space_info->total_bytes, 98);
 
 	/* If we're just plain full then async reclaim just slows us down. */
-	if (space_info->bytes_used >= thresh)
+	if ((space_info->bytes_used + space_info->bytes_reserved) >= thresh)
 		return 0;
 
 	return (used >= thresh && !btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info) &&
@@ -5373,27 +5373,33 @@ static void update_global_block_rsv(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 
 	block_rsv->size = min_t(u64, num_bytes, SZ_512M);
 
-	num_bytes = sinfo->bytes_used + sinfo->bytes_pinned +
-		    sinfo->bytes_reserved + sinfo->bytes_readonly +
-		    sinfo->bytes_may_use;
-
-	if (sinfo->total_bytes > num_bytes) {
-		num_bytes = sinfo->total_bytes - num_bytes;
-		block_rsv->reserved += num_bytes;
-		sinfo->bytes_may_use += num_bytes;
-		trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "space_info",
-				      sinfo->flags, num_bytes, 1);
-	}
-
-	if (block_rsv->reserved >= block_rsv->size) {
+	if (block_rsv->reserved < block_rsv->size) {
+		num_bytes = sinfo->bytes_used + sinfo->bytes_pinned +
+			sinfo->bytes_reserved + sinfo->bytes_readonly +
+			sinfo->bytes_may_use;
+		if (sinfo->total_bytes > num_bytes) {
+			num_bytes = sinfo->total_bytes - num_bytes;
+			num_bytes = min(num_bytes,
+					block_rsv->size - block_rsv->reserved);
+			block_rsv->reserved += num_bytes;
+			sinfo->bytes_may_use += num_bytes;
+			trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "space_info",
+						      sinfo->flags, num_bytes,
+						      1);
+		}
+	} else if (block_rsv->reserved > block_rsv->size) {
 		num_bytes = block_rsv->reserved - block_rsv->size;
 		sinfo->bytes_may_use -= num_bytes;
 		trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "space_info",
 				      sinfo->flags, num_bytes, 0);
 		block_rsv->reserved = block_rsv->size;
-		block_rsv->full = 1;
 	}
 
+	if (block_rsv->reserved == block_rsv->size)
+		block_rsv->full = 1;
+	else
+		block_rsv->full = 0;
+
 	spin_unlock(&block_rsv->lock);
 	spin_unlock(&sinfo->lock);
 }
@@ -5752,7 +5758,7 @@ out_fail:
 
 		/*
 		 * This is tricky, but first we need to figure out how much we
-		 * free'd from any free-ers that occured during this
+		 * free'd from any free-ers that occurred during this
 		 * reservation, so we reset ->csum_bytes to the csum_bytes
 		 * before we dropped our lock, and then call the free for the
 		 * number of bytes that were freed while we were trying our
@@ -7018,7 +7024,7 @@ btrfs_lock_cluster(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
 		   struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster,
 		   int delalloc)
 {
-	struct btrfs_block_group_cache *used_bg;
+	struct btrfs_block_group_cache *used_bg = NULL;
 	bool locked = false;
 again:
 	spin_lock(&cluster->refill_lock);