x86/fpu: Decouple fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() from fpu->fpregs_active

The fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() are currently called in such a pattern:

	if (!fpu->fpregs_active)
		fpregs_activate(fpu);

	...

	if (fpu->fpregs_active)
		fpregs_deactivate(fpu);

But note that it's actually safe to call them without checking the flag first.

This further decouples the fpu->fpregs_active flag from actual FPU logic.

Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
index eab244622402..01a47e9edfb4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -426,8 +426,7 @@ void fpu__drop(struct fpu *fpu)
 			asm volatile("1: fwait\n"
 				     "2:\n"
 				     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b));
-			if (fpu->fpregs_active)
-				fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
+			fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
 		}
 	} else {
 		WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active);