aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/Kconfig
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2014-01-20 10:26:31 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2014-01-20 10:26:31 -0800
commitad3ab302fd8239a1ddee01e606683c3197ca6908 (patch)
treed4984d29bcc90252118bdf3a0c32d5c1e027fc08 /arch/Kconfig
parenta693c46e14c9fdadbcd68ddfa94a4f72495531a9 (diff)
parent8779657d29c0ebcc0c94ede4df2f497baf1b563f (diff)
Merge branch 'core-stackprotector-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull strong stackprotector support from Ingo Molnar: "This tree adds a CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y, a new, stronger stack canary checking method supported by the newest GCC versions (4.9 and later). Here's the 'intensity comparison' between the various protection modes: - defconfig 11430641 kernel text size 36110 function bodies - defconfig + CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_REGULAR 11468490 kernel text size (+0.33%) 1015 of 36110 functions are stack-protected (2.81%) - defconfig + CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG via this patch 11692790 kernel text size (+2.24%) 7401 of 36110 functions are stack-protected (20.5%) the strong model comes with non-trivial costs, which is why we preserved the 'regular' and 'none' models as well" * 'core-stackprotector-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: stackprotector: Introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG stackprotector: Unify the HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR logic between architectures
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/Kconfig')
-rw-r--r--arch/Kconfig67
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index f1cf895c040f..80bbb8ccd0d1 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -336,6 +336,73 @@ config SECCOMP_FILTER
See Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt for details.
+config HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+ bool
+ help
+ An arch should select this symbol if:
+ - its compiler supports the -fstack-protector option
+ - it has implemented a stack canary (e.g. __stack_chk_guard)
+
+config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+ def_bool n
+ help
+ Set when a stack-protector mode is enabled, so that the build
+ can enable kernel-side support for the GCC feature.
+
+choice
+ prompt "Stack Protector buffer overflow detection"
+ depends on HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+ default CC_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE
+ help
+ This option turns on the "stack-protector" GCC feature. This
+ feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
+ the stack just before the return address, and validates
+ the value just before actually returning. Stack based buffer
+ overflows (that need to overwrite this return address) now also
+ overwrite the canary, which gets detected and the attack is then
+ neutralized via a kernel panic.
+
+config CC_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE
+ bool "None"
+ help
+ Disable "stack-protector" GCC feature.
+
+config CC_STACKPROTECTOR_REGULAR
+ bool "Regular"
+ select CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+ help
+ Functions will have the stack-protector canary logic added if they
+ have an 8-byte or larger character array on the stack.
+
+ This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above, or a distribution
+ gcc with the feature backported ("-fstack-protector").
+
+ On an x86 "defconfig" build, this feature adds canary checks to
+ about 3% of all kernel functions, which increases kernel code size
+ by about 0.3%.
+
+config CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG
+ bool "Strong"
+ select CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+ help
+ Functions will have the stack-protector canary logic added in any
+ of the following conditions:
+
+ - local variable's address used as part of the right hand side of an
+ assignment or function argument
+ - local variable is an array (or union containing an array),
+ regardless of array type or length
+ - uses register local variables
+
+ This feature requires gcc version 4.9 or above, or a distribution
+ gcc with the feature backported ("-fstack-protector-strong").
+
+ On an x86 "defconfig" build, this feature adds canary checks to
+ about 20% of all kernel functions, which increases the kernel code
+ size by about 2%.
+
+endchoice
+
config HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
bool
help