diff options
author | Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> | 2024-05-27 18:39:55 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> | 2024-05-28 19:46:41 -0700 |
commit | fb66df20a7201e60f2b13d7f95d031b31a8831d3 (patch) | |
tree | adaf982615c1efa41f6adbd2d0c633faf6283c00 | |
parent | e634134180885574d1fe7aa162777ba41e7fcd5b (diff) |
net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the
blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a
cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of
entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must
be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule
entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle
time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so
we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)"
branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.
Fixes: b5b73b26b3ca ("taprio: Fix allowing too small intervals")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r-- | net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/taprio.json | 22 |
2 files changed, 27 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c index 118915055360..937a0c513c17 100644 --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c @@ -1151,11 +1151,6 @@ static int parse_taprio_schedule(struct taprio_sched *q, struct nlattr **tb, list_for_each_entry(entry, &new->entries, list) cycle = ktime_add_ns(cycle, entry->interval); - if (!cycle) { - NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "'cycle_time' can never be 0"); - return -EINVAL; - } - if (cycle < 0 || cycle > INT_MAX) { NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "'cycle_time' is too big"); return -EINVAL; @@ -1164,6 +1159,11 @@ static int parse_taprio_schedule(struct taprio_sched *q, struct nlattr **tb, new->cycle_time = cycle; } + if (new->cycle_time < new->num_entries * length_to_duration(q, ETH_ZLEN)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "'cycle_time' is too small"); + return -EINVAL; + } + taprio_calculate_gate_durations(q, new); return 0; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/taprio.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/taprio.json index 8f12f00a4f57..557fb074acf0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/taprio.json +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/taprio.json @@ -155,6 +155,28 @@ ] }, { + "id": "831f", + "name": "Add taprio Qdisc with too short cycle-time", + "category": [ + "qdisc", + "taprio" + ], + "plugins": { + "requires": "nsPlugin" + }, + "setup": [ + "echo \"1 1 8\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device" + ], + "cmdUnderTest": "$TC qdisc add dev $ETH root handle 1: taprio num_tc 2 queues 1@0 1@1 sched-entry S 01 200000 sched-entry S 02 200000 cycle-time 100 clockid CLOCK_TAI", + "expExitCode": "2", + "verifyCmd": "$TC qdisc show dev $ETH", + "matchPattern": "qdisc taprio 1: root refcnt", + "matchCount": "0", + "teardown": [ + "echo \"1\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" + ] + }, + { "id": "3e1e", "name": "Add taprio Qdisc with an invalid cycle-time", "category": [ |