net/mlx5e: Again mutually exclude RX-FCS and RX-port-timestamp

Commit 1e66220948df8 ("net/mlx5e: Update rx ring hw mtu upon each rx-fcs
flag change") seems to have accidentally inverted the logic added in
commit 0bc73ad46a76 ("net/mlx5e: Mutually exclude RX-FCS and
RX-port-timestamp").

The impact of this is a little unclear since it seems the FCS scattered
with RX-FCS is (usually?) correct regardless.

Fixes: 1e66220948df8 ("net/mlx5e: Update rx ring hw mtu upon each rx-fcs flag change")
Tested-by: Charlotte Tan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Charlotte Tan <[email protected]>
Cc: Adham Faris <[email protected]>
Cc: Aya Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Cc: Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Mortensen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index a2ae791538ed..acb40770cf0c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -3952,13 +3952,14 @@ static int set_feature_rx_fcs(struct net_device *netdev, bool enable)
 	struct mlx5e_channels *chs = &priv->channels;
 	struct mlx5e_params new_params;
 	int err;
+	bool rx_ts_over_crc = !enable;
 
 	mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
 
 	new_params = chs->params;
 	new_params.scatter_fcs_en = enable;
 	err = mlx5e_safe_switch_params(priv, &new_params, mlx5e_set_rx_port_ts_wrap,
-				       &new_params.scatter_fcs_en, true);
+				       &rx_ts_over_crc, true);
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock);
 	return err;
 }