diff options
author | Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> | 2024-01-10 18:00:45 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> | 2024-02-22 16:28:45 -0800 |
commit | d746182337c205660fd4d8eaa5fdc4f4e8320b9a (patch) | |
tree | a6c3f25fc3fc490492b90a6c17d12baa9771b506 | |
parent | 99b85fda91b164b91a0d4e0aae376f32dc38d59c (diff) |
KVM: x86/mmu: Skip invalid TDP MMU roots when write-protecting SPTEs
When write-protecting SPTEs, don't process invalid roots as invalid roots
are unreachable, i.e. can't be used to access guest memory and thus don't
need to be write-protected.
Note, this is *almost* a nop for kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_pt_masked(),
which is called under slots_lock, i.e. is mutually exclusive with
kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(). But it's possible for something other than the
"fast zap" thread to grab a reference to an invalid root and thus keep a
root alive (but completely empty) after kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() completes.
The kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn() case is more interesting as KVM write-
protects SPTEs for reasons other than dirty logging, e.g. if a KVM creates
a SPTE for a nested VM while a fast zap is in-progress.
Add another TDP MMU iterator to visit only valid roots, and
opportunistically convert kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa() to said iterator.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c index 1a9c16e5c287..e0a8343f66dc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c @@ -171,12 +171,19 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm, * Holding mmu_lock for write obviates the need for RCU protection as the list * is guaranteed to be stable. */ -#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id) \ +#define __for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id, _only_valid) \ list_for_each_entry(_root, &_kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) \ if (kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(_kvm, false) && \ - _as_id >= 0 && kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) { \ + ((_as_id >= 0 && kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) || \ + ((_only_valid) && (_root)->role.invalid))) { \ } else +#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id) \ + __for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id, false) + +#define for_each_valid_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id) \ + __for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id, true) + static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm_mmu_page *sp; @@ -224,11 +231,8 @@ hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); - /* - * Check for an existing root before allocating a new one. Note, the - * role check prevents consuming an invalid root. - */ - for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, kvm_mmu_role_as_id(role)) { + /* Check for an existing root before allocating a new one. */ + for_each_valid_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, kvm_mmu_role_as_id(role)) { if (root->role.word == role.word && kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(root)) goto out; @@ -1639,7 +1643,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm, { struct kvm_mmu_page *root; - for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, slot->as_id) + for_each_valid_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, slot->as_id) clear_dirty_pt_masked(kvm, root, gfn, mask, wrprot); } @@ -1757,7 +1761,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, bool spte_set = false; lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); - for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, slot->as_id) + for_each_valid_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, slot->as_id) spte_set |= write_protect_gfn(kvm, root, gfn, min_level); return spte_set; |