aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChen Yu <[email protected]>2024-09-25 16:54:40 +0800
committerPeter Zijlstra <[email protected]>2024-10-02 11:27:54 +0200
commitd4ac164bde7a12ec0a238a7ead5aa26819bbb1c1 (patch)
tree7ac2beb302f0260f6d4437d86af83b63b290fd0f
parent9b5ce1a37e904fac32d560668134965f4e937f6c (diff)
sched/eevdf: Fix wakeup-preempt by checking cfs_rq->nr_running
Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt") introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before 85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after 85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr() would happen. Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been increased by 2.2%: 1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches Restore its previous check criterion. Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected] Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Honglei Wang <[email protected]> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/fair.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b63a7ac31162..ab497fafa7be 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
- if (rq->nr_running == 1)
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
return;
if (resched || did_preempt_short(cfs_rq, curr)) {