rcu/nocb: Remove needless LOAD-ACQUIRE

The LOAD-ACQUIRE access performed on rdp->nocb_cb_sleep advertizes
ordering callback execution against grace period completion. However
this is contradicted by the following:

* This LOAD-ACQUIRE doesn't pair with anything. The only counterpart
  barrier that can be found is the smp_mb() placed after callbacks
  advancing in nocb_gp_wait(). However the barrier is placed _after_
  ->nocb_cb_sleep write.

* Callbacks can be concurrently advanced between the LOAD-ACQUIRE on
  ->nocb_cb_sleep and the call to rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs() in
  rcu_do_batch(), making any ordering based on ->nocb_cb_sleep broken.

* Both rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs() and rcu_advance_cbs() are called
  under the nocb_lock, the latter hereby providing already the desired
  ACQUIRE semantics.

Therefore it is safe to access ->nocb_cb_sleep with a simple compiler
barrier.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 4efbf7333d4e..785946834c6b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -933,8 +933,7 @@ static void nocb_cb_wait(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		swait_event_interruptible_exclusive(rdp->nocb_cb_wq,
 						    nocb_cb_wait_cond(rdp));
 
-		// VVV Ensure CB invocation follows _sleep test.
-		if (smp_load_acquire(&rdp->nocb_cb_sleep)) { // ^^^
+		if (READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_cb_sleep)) {
 			WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
 			trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, TPS("WokeEmpty"));
 		}