aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]>2018-06-24 22:47:40 -0700
committerDhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]>2018-06-26 11:44:55 -0700
commitc12e0643a05d978657877630d4da1ace06ea3720 (patch)
tree461efd4f52fe98a6c5c99df846cab9fff52f8181
parentcf5d862db2e301b8e487f42f99c5cf6f5228ddae (diff)
drm/i915/psr: Fix race in intel_psr_work()
Commit 5422b37c907e ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back.") switched from delayed work to the plain variant and while doing so removed the check for work_busy() before scheduling a PSR activation. This appears to cause consecutive executions of psr_activate() in this scenario - after a worker picks up the PSR work item for execution and before the work function can acquire the PSR mutex, a psr_flush() can get hold of the mutex and schedule another PSR work. Without a psr_exit() between the two psr_activate() calls, warning messages get printed. Further, since we drop the mutex in the midst of psr_work() to wait for PSR to idle, another work item can also get scheduled. Fix this by returning if PSR was already active. Fixes: 5422b37c907e ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back.") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106948 Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index ccaee4a748f2..276070d597e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
* recheck. Since psr_flush first clears this and then reschedules we
* won't ever miss a flush when bailing out here.
*/
- if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
+ if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits || dev_priv->psr.active)
goto unlock;
intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled);