x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0

Patch series "mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in  memory layout", v3.

Commit 73a6e474cb37 ("mm: memmap_init: iterate over memblock regions
rather that check each PFN") exposed several issues with the memory map
initialization and these patches fix those issues.

Initially there were crashes during compaction that Qian Cai reported
back in April [1].  It seemed back then that the problem was fixed, but
a few weeks ago Andrea Arcangeli hit the same bug [2] and there was an
additional discussion at [3].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/20201206005401.qKuAVgOXr%[email protected]

This patch (of 2):

The first 4Kb of memory is a BIOS owned area and to avoid its allocation
for the kernel it was not listed in e820 tables as memory.  As the result,
pfn 0 was never recognised by the generic memory management and it is not
a part of neither node 0 nor ZONE_DMA.

If set_pfnblock_flags_mask() would be ever called for the pageblock
corresponding to the first 2Mbytes of memory, having pfn 0 outside of
ZONE_DMA would trigger

	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn), page);

Along with reserving the first 4Kb in e820 tables, several first pages are
reserved with memblock in several places during setup_arch().  These
reservations are enough to ensure the kernel does not touch the BIOS area
and it is not necessary to remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0.

Remove the update of e820 table that changes the type of pfn 0 and move
the comment describing why it was done to trim_low_memory_range() that
reserves the beginning of the memory.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Cc: Baoquan He <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 740f3bdb3f61..3412c4595efd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -661,17 +661,6 @@ static void __init trim_platform_memory_ranges(void)
 static void __init trim_bios_range(void)
 {
 	/*
-	 * A special case is the first 4Kb of memory;
-	 * This is a BIOS owned area, not kernel ram, but generally
-	 * not listed as such in the E820 table.
-	 *
-	 * This typically reserves additional memory (64KiB by default)
-	 * since some BIOSes are known to corrupt low memory.  See the
-	 * Kconfig help text for X86_RESERVE_LOW.
-	 */
-	e820__range_update(0, PAGE_SIZE, E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
-
-	/*
 	 * special case: Some BIOSes report the PC BIOS
 	 * area (640Kb -> 1Mb) as RAM even though it is not.
 	 * take them out.
@@ -728,6 +717,15 @@ early_param("reservelow", parse_reservelow);
 
 static void __init trim_low_memory_range(void)
 {
+	/*
+	 * A special case is the first 4Kb of memory;
+	 * This is a BIOS owned area, not kernel ram, but generally
+	 * not listed as such in the E820 table.
+	 *
+	 * This typically reserves additional memory (64KiB by default)
+	 * since some BIOSes are known to corrupt low memory.  See the
+	 * Kconfig help text for X86_RESERVE_LOW.
+	 */
 	memblock_reserve(0, ALIGN(reserve_low, PAGE_SIZE));
 }