diff options
| author | Zong-Zhe Yang <[email protected]> | 2023-08-16 16:21:29 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kalle Valo <[email protected]> | 2023-08-25 12:58:28 +0300 |
| commit | b05fdc46c5a64358f515c4db31991f609a572b53 (patch) | |
| tree | 171f1944333ef7d96274b03b886fe92fa52fb914 | |
| parent | 64a24cb63a4b6036e4af280767b305a5044ff303 (diff) | |
wifi: rtw89: refine rtw89_correct_cck_chan() by rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band()
In rtw89_correct_cck_chan(), we turn to use rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band().
The difference between rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band() and the original raw
judgement is the case on 6 GHz. Since rtw89_correct_cck_chan() is common
code independent on chip, if runtime chip doesn't support 6 GHz, it is
probably safe. Otherwise, it might not.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c index a338b0a97910..aedabd262251 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c @@ -1659,8 +1659,7 @@ static void rtw89_correct_cck_chan(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const struct rtw89_chan_rcd *rcd = rtw89_chan_rcd_get(rtwdev, RTW89_SUB_ENTITY_0); u16 chan = rcd->prev_primary_channel; - u8 band = rcd->prev_band_type == RTW89_BAND_2G ? - NL80211_BAND_2GHZ : NL80211_BAND_5GHZ; + u8 band = rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(rcd->prev_band_type); if (status->band != NL80211_BAND_2GHZ && status->encoding == RX_ENC_LEGACY && |